Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Security Forum: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 240876070 by Nick Dowling (talk)
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


* '''Keep as is''' How is this not notable? Sir [[Ken Knight]] will be speaking there and it is under the patronage of the UAE Interior Ministry. I wonder what is suspicious about that. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/217.232.157.59|217.232.157.59]] ([[User talk:217.232.157.59|talk]]) 11:18, 25 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
* '''Keep as is''' How is this not notable? Sir [[Ken Knight]] will be speaking there and it is under the patronage of the UAE Interior Ministry. I wonder what is suspicious about that. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/217.232.157.59|217.232.157.59]] ([[User talk:217.232.157.59|talk]]) 11:18, 25 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

* '''Keep''' The event has clearly been covered by major media in the Middle East and enjoys the official support of the United Nations. I agree that we should not even be discussing this article's deletion.

Revision as of 11:46, 25 September 2008

World Security Forum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable conference; borderline advertising. Blowdart | talk 10:23, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The sources within the article link to websites that I would not consider reliable, a quick google news search on "World Security Forum" turns up no relevant results (you would think, google news being a sort of compendium of baseline and better reliable sources would turn up something), the event seems suspicious at best, with next to none outside middle-east coverage. Because of these factors I think the article fails general notability guidelines. — ^.^ [citation needed] 11:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The event has clearly been covered by major media in the Middle East and enjoys the official support of the United Nations. I agree that we should not even be discussing this article's deletion.