Talk:Abstinence, be faithful, use a condom: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
''Advocating this ideal, whilst pragmatically dealing with the fact that abstinence only sex education is ineffective by itself, has made the ABC approach more palatable to many African governments and U.S. funding agencies who answer to a majority Christian voter base.[citation needed]'' |
''Advocating this ideal, whilst pragmatically dealing with the fact that abstinence only sex education is ineffective by itself, has made the ABC approach more palatable to many African governments and U.S. funding agencies who answer to a majority Christian voter base.[citation needed]'' |
||
<br>A citation is needed as the conservative group the Heritage Foundation does not find Absintance-plus palatable at all. See [http://www.heritage.org/Research/Abstinence/abstinencereport.cfm] [[User:Chops79|Chops79]] ([[User talk:Chops79|talk]]) 18:20, 7 March 2008 (UTC) |
<br>A citation is needed as the conservative group the Heritage Foundation does not find Absintance-plus palatable at all. See [http://www.heritage.org/Research/Abstinence/abstinencereport.cfm] [[User:Chops79|Chops79]] ([[User talk:Chops79|talk]]) 18:20, 7 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
==Harm reduction== |
|||
The discussion on harm reduction v. risk reduction seems to be an academic discussion of the differences in philosophy of the two approaches. Is it really germane to the ABC entry itself? It it is at issue then this should be stated. [[Special:Contributions/206.193.225.70|206.193.225.70]] ([[User talk:206.193.225.70|talk]]) 19:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:36, 25 September 2008
 | Medicine Stub‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
From the article:
Advocating this ideal, whilst pragmatically dealing with the fact that abstinence only sex education is ineffective by itself, has made the ABC approach more palatable to many African governments and U.S. funding agencies who answer to a majority Christian voter base.[citation needed]
A citation is needed as the conservative group the Heritage Foundation does not find Absintance-plus palatable at all. See [1] Chops79 (talk) 18:20, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Harm reduction
The discussion on harm reduction v. risk reduction seems to be an academic discussion of the differences in philosophy of the two approaches. Is it really germane to the ABC entry itself? It it is at issue then this should be stated. 206.193.225.70 (talk) 19:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)