Talk:Computer Weekly: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→Name?: new section |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
sound more like an advert [[User:Johncmullen1960|Johncmullen1960]] 13:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC)<br /> |
sound more like an advert [[User:Johncmullen1960|Johncmullen1960]] 13:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC)<br /> |
||
I've amended this so it sounds less like an advert. Hope you agree? If not - let me know via this discussion board. Thanks --[[User:Janeshackleton|Jane]] 14:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC) |
I've amended this so it sounds less like an advert. Hope you agree? If not - let me know via this discussion board. Thanks --[[User:Janeshackleton|Jane]] 14:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Name? == |
|||
It's variously given as Computer Weekly and ComputerWeekly. Some standardisation would be useful. [[Special:Contributions/86.136.250.154|86.136.250.154]] ([[User talk:86.136.250.154|talk]]) 20:44, 26 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:44, 26 September 2008
sound more like an advert Johncmullen1960 13:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I've amended this so it sounds less like an advert. Hope you agree? If not - let me know via this discussion board. Thanks --Jane 14:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Name?
It's variously given as Computer Weekly and ComputerWeekly. Some standardisation would be useful. 86.136.250.154 (talk) 20:44, 26 September 2008 (UTC)