Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bani Walia: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Relisting debate |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<hr style="width:50%;"/> |
<hr style="width:50%;"/> |
||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle/wizard|talk]]) 07:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle/wizard|talk]]) 07:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
||
*'''Keep''' or '''merge''' per everyone, notable unoriginal research verified in reliable sources. Needs to exist in some capacity. Also per boilerplate nomination “rationales” across multiple AfDs.--[[Special:Contributions/63.3.1.2|63.3.1.2]] ([[User talk:63.3.1.2|talk]]) 14:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:40, 27 September 2008
- Bani Walia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 22:40, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Google turned up very few hits which included fan sites, blogs, and video hosts. Unlikely sources exist to establish notability. Article is entirely plot summary. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 06:44, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- Merge as for such things in general. An appropriate summary of the information does not seem to be in the main article on the show. Probable a separate page for characters of is warranted. and, as a minimum, Redirect. This needn't come here, unless someone is prepared to give an argument why even a redirect from the name of a principal character is unwarranted. DGG (talk) 01:50, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- Merge/(Delete)/Redirect for consisting solely of content that wikipedia is not for in such detail (unsourced plot). – sgeureka t•c 18:27, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 07:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep or merge per everyone, notable unoriginal research verified in reliable sources. Needs to exist in some capacity. Also per boilerplate nomination “rationales” across multiple AfDs.--63.3.1.2 (talk) 14:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)