Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zorg ZF-1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Nburden (talk | contribs)
Delete.
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
*'''Delete''' as non-notable and basically a paraphrase of the movie (with all the copyright implications that come with such things). [[User:Nburden|<span style="color:#800">N<span style="color:#a00">b<span style="color:#b00">u'''<span style="color:#c00">r</span>d'''</span>'''e'''</span>'''n'''</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:Nburden|(T)]]</font></sup> 08:39, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as non-notable and basically a paraphrase of the movie (with all the copyright implications that come with such things). [[User:Nburden|<span style="color:#800">N<span style="color:#a00">b<span style="color:#b00">u'''<span style="color:#c00">r</span>d'''</span>'''e'''</span>'''n'''</span>]] <sup><font size="-2">[[User talk:Nburden|(T)]]</font></sup> 08:39, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science fiction|list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:Fabrictramp|<font color="#960018" face="comic sans ms">Fabrictramp</font>]] | [[User talk:Fabrictramp|<font color="#960018" face="Papyrus">talk to me</font>]] 20:28, 24 September 2008 (UTC)</small>
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science fiction|list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:Fabrictramp|<font color="#960018" face="comic sans ms">Fabrictramp</font>]] | [[User talk:Fabrictramp|<font color="#960018" face="Papyrus">talk to me</font>]] 20:28, 24 September 2008 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep''' as unoriginal research and because we are a collection of info.--[[Special:Contributions/63.3.1.2|63.3.1.2]] ([[User talk:63.3.1.2|talk]]) 14:52, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:52, 27 September 2008

Zorg ZF-1

Zorg ZF-1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This element of fiction does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 22:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete It's mentioned in the main article for The Fifth Element and I think that is enough. Since Zorg is a main character, and already has a redirect, I cannot see creating one also for the weapon. I wish at least this much level of explanation had been present in the nomination to facilitate the discussion. But I too want to se such articles deleted, and I'll try to fill the gaps in the rationale. DGG (talk) 07:47, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not particularly notable and unlikely search term. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:27, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as non-notable and basically a paraphrase of the movie (with all the copyright implications that come with such things). Nburden (T) 08:39, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:28, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as unoriginal research and because we are a collection of info.--63.3.1.2 (talk) 14:52, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]