Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All By Students (ABS) Notebooks: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→All By Students (ABS) Notebooks: Going to WP:COIN again |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I looked before setting this up for AfD. Basically nothing beyond what's on the page -- a single gnews hit, 8 google hits. I marked it as a classic "public relations" type piece, hence the spam. I agree, it's not obvious spam, or a candidate for G12. [[User:RayAYang|RayAYang]] ([[User talk:RayAYang|talk]]) 23:01, 1 October 2008 (UTC) |
:I looked before setting this up for AfD. Basically nothing beyond what's on the page -- a single gnews hit, 8 google hits. I marked it as a classic "public relations" type piece, hence the spam. I agree, it's not obvious spam, or a candidate for G12. [[User:RayAYang|RayAYang]] ([[User talk:RayAYang|talk]]) 23:01, 1 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Note''' — Creator has removed a {{tl|coi}} tag from the article among others. This can be better explained at [[WP:COIN]]. <font color="#063">[[User:MuZemike|MuZemike]]</font> (<font color="#063">[[User talk:MuZemike|talk]]</font>) 23:12, 1 October 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Note''' — Creator has removed a {{tl|coi}} tag from the article among others. This can be better explained at [[WP:COIN]]. <font color="#063">[[User:MuZemike|MuZemike]]</font> (<font color="#063">[[User talk:MuZemike|talk]]</font>) 23:12, 1 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'"Note"' - I am the creator. I removed all the tags because I thought I had solved the issue by editing the language to make the tone neutral. I had initially just grabbed the language from blogs and articles written about them, but after it was tagged went back with a more discerning eye- sorry about all the confusion. |
Revision as of 18:42, 3 October 2008
All By Students (ABS) Notebooks
- All By Students (ABS) Notebooks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:SPAM, WP:ORG. WP:COI issues too RayAYang (talk) 18:30, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- RayAYang (talk) 18:32, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- Keep this may actually be notable. It does pass V--the sources are OK for the purpose. And it does not read as spam. DGG (talk) 19:04, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- I looked before setting this up for AfD. Basically nothing beyond what's on the page -- a single gnews hit, 8 google hits. I marked it as a classic "public relations" type piece, hence the spam. I agree, it's not obvious spam, or a candidate for G12. RayAYang (talk) 23:01, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- Note — Creator has removed a {{coi}} tag from the article among others. This can be better explained at WP:COIN. MuZemike (talk) 23:12, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- '"Note"' - I am the creator. I removed all the tags because I thought I had solved the issue by editing the language to make the tone neutral. I had initially just grabbed the language from blogs and articles written about them, but after it was tagged went back with a more discerning eye- sorry about all the confusion.