Talk:Kluger Agency: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
) |
) |
||
== Third Opinion Help. == |
|||
I am a bit confused on what the controversy is. All I can tell is that an anon user has repeatedly reverted your edits without comment. Are you trying to add links, or other information? I also see that the anon user has not participated in any discussion with you that I can see, so no matter what, there is no way to know that the other the anon user will respect any decision made by me or any other editor. Part of the [[WP:Dispute]] process is discussion, but since very little has happened, I would suggest that [[User:Fakelvis]] continue to make his [[WP:Good faith|good faith]] edits and if the anon user reverts more than three times in one day, then report them to [[WP:AN3]], which is a page that reports abusive editors. Please leave any comments on my [[User talk:Jojhutton|talk page]], if you have any questions. |
|||
As a side note, you may want to reword the first sentence after ''Clients'', as it seems to be a [[WP:Weasel|weasel phrase]].--[[User:Jojhutton|Jojhutton]] ([[User talk:Jojhutton|talk]]) 01:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:11, 4 October 2008
fakelvis, you have no clue what you are speaking of. Brand integration is when a brand is integrated into a production. To my knowledge, that's what TKA does. Brand awareness is not a service nor a proper business term for what TKA does. Your credible sources arn't credible at all. Everything links back to a post made on antiadvertisingagency.com which was fabricated as a "joke story". Wired.com accidentally picked up spam as a story, that's why if you try and contact the writer (elliot), he will not respond and not comment. If you want to be a "wikipedia" writer...then contact the agency yourself. Don't take fabricated information and try to pass it off as the truth. This conversation and dispute is OVER. I will delete all that you write if it is not truthful or accurate.
)