Talk:Albanisation

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 June 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep.

General comments

The text seems to have an anti-Albanian bias. Travelbird 03:37, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

-Is this an actual term? If not article should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.9.215.87 (talk • contribs) 21:01, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Disruptive edit the references are clear and to the pointdiffMegistias (talk) 15:56, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Uncited

Kosovo (Albanian: Kosova) is a good example; Kosovo was in the early 15th century, dominantly Serb, but since Albanians great diaspora, the Albanians have overrun the serbian population in Kosovo, making Serbs leave, Kosovo has been Albanisated. Albanisation of territories can also be seen in western Macedonia, as well as in Northwestern Greece, Arbereshe, in Italy and Montenegro. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FrancisTyers (talk • contribs) 23:00, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Its actually the opposite, how can Albanians one of the smallest peoples in Europe and Balkans Albanizy other several times bigger peoples than them, like Slavs and others, forget about Kosovo and 15th century, before 700 A.D there were no slavic peoples even close to Balkan region and now almost entire Balkans, eastern Europe and the largest country on Earth Russia is Slavic. Now that Is what I would call Albanisation sorry SLAVisation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.229.100.23 (talk) 01:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Serbian propaganda

The majority of the population of Kosovo has always been Albanians. In thw 15th century Kosovo was dominantly Albanian. The term Albanisation is somthing Serbs have made up. Albanians have always been victims of Serbianization. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noah30 (talk • contribs) 20:13, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

The term

The term Albania in Albanian languge don´t exist als souch how it is in english and other gjerman and latin family languges. In fact albanisation is a term witch is meaning, calling more Albanians (Albanian is "Shqiptar") elements in souch languges Albanian.

This is comming from peopel who dont know nothing about albanians in real life, but from some boocks and idiotic logic thate only Albanians in Albania are Albanias. For souch peopel is good to be created a article Shqiptar, Shqipëria and Shqipnija after thate they will understand thate the word albanisation hase nothing to do with "albanisation" but with repareng the measteks in english languge witch is comming from the Serbian ortodox literatur. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hipi Zhdripi (talk • contribs) -using the IP 88.70.184.110 (talk · contribs)- 15:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

POV Tag

I'm doing POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 21:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Neutrality disputed / Original research

I have added two templates to the article because the article contains many claims that are not verified. The article is based on original research and this is against the Wikipedia-rules. I beleive this article is created for propaganda purposes and does not describe a phenomenon. --Noah30 (talk) 09:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

The most stupid article ever on WP

Wow, I can't believe that this article existed, my faith on WP fades rapidly ... no more comments.--Pinjolli 22:03, 19 July 2008 (UTC)