Talk:Exomoon: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I concur, this has exceeded its reach. Also the www.space.com article is long outdated (eg. 100 planets now 270+), and I am still searching for a reference to the Roman Numeral suggestion in the Nomenclature (??). - [[User:GabrielVelasquez|GabrielVelasquez]] ([[User talk:GabrielVelasquez|talk]]) 02:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC) |
:I concur, this has exceeded its reach. Also the www.space.com article is long outdated (eg. 100 planets now 270+), and I am still searching for a reference to the Roman Numeral suggestion in the Nomenclature (??). - [[User:GabrielVelasquez|GabrielVelasquez]] ([[User talk:GabrielVelasquez|talk]]) 02:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
= New Info = |
|||
Hello, I just read this article and I attempted to insert some of the information about how to detect exomoons. I did not know how to insert a reference. Can someone do this? |
|||
http://www.centauri-dreams.org/?p=3856 |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/72.141.173.208|72.141.173.208]] ([[User talk:72.141.173.208|talk]]) 20:11, 23 October 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:11, 23 October 2008
Relevence
While the article is aimed at Extrasolar Moons, I think that the writer went a little off the target with this.
- I concur, this has exceeded its reach. Also the www.space.com article is long outdated (eg. 100 planets now 270+), and I am still searching for a reference to the Roman Numeral suggestion in the Nomenclature (??). - GabrielVelasquez (talk) 02:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
New Info
Hello, I just read this article and I attempted to insert some of the information about how to detect exomoons. I did not know how to insert a reference. Can someone do this?