User talk:Alpha 4615

Template:Werdnabot

Re: Trivium

Hey, you were trying to revert the vandalism for Trivium but in doing so you reverted someone else's attempt to revert and reverted to the version that was the vandalised version by someone :P. Quite funny though :P But its fixed now :) Silent Assassin (talk) 07:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Rollback request at Sandy's talk

Hi saw your request at Sandy's page. Approach somebody from , if you have not approached anybody til now. I had recently approached User:Acalamari.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 08:25, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Request for Rollback

Hi there Knippschild, per your request I have just granted roll back on your account. Please see WP:RBK for full instructions or feel free to ask me if you need any help - most important thing to remember is that in must only be used to revert vandalism. Good luck & kind regards, Nancy ^talk 08:31, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Knippschild (talk) 08:32, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Kevin Kline Edits

The edits I made took away two sources that were not reliable- one was a personal blog for the love of God. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.232.166.37 (talk) 09:51, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Good work!

Hi, Knippschild! I was feeling kind of lonely fighting vandals until you came along and started beating me to it :) You're doing a pretty good job. So here you go:

		CVU Anti-Vandalism Award
		This award is presented to Knippschild in recognition of his quick reversions of vandalism, and managing to beat me to it. Chamal talk work 10:53, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Chamal ^talk _work 10:53, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Heh... Just saw this message I had left you earlier. So who's beating who now? ;) Glad to see you've got rollback and huggle now, you're doing a good job with them. Chamal ^talk _work 10:57, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Vladek Spiegelman

I realize you're using an automated tool, but I explained the reason for my edit in the edit summary. I'm reverting your edit.71.240.67.58 (talk) 11:37, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I know sorry. Pressed Q by accident. Don't hate me too much? I reverted my reverts :) Knippschild (talk) 11:38, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Landmark

Hi there, you reverted my edit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landmark+Education?diff=246280095 due to supposed NPOV but having read the article referenced I think the edit is appropriate. Please read the article and suggest a better revision if you think fit --- but note that the quote as it appears is cherry-picked and does not reflect the tone of the referenced article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.156.33 (talk) 13:29, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps this is better. Knippschild (talk) 13:46, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Better indeed, thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.156.33 (talk) 13:48, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi Knippschild - with respect, I would suggest that the edit (even in your toned-down form) is inappropriate and should be reverted as IMHO it violates WP:UNDUE WEIGHT. For one thing, it is an expression of opinion rather than fact; and furthermore the opinion of a single individual with no particular claim to expertise in the subject. Secondly, it is an atypical quote from the article which does not capture the overall thrust (even the editor admits it was "cherry-picked"); for example Badt also says "I did experience my own breakthroughs. I was glad I went. I did see how I used my past in my future; I did contemplate the rackets I laid on my friends and family. I thought overall this was a healthy experience.", and "There was nothing too objectionable about a program that has as a result reconciliation in relationships, as well as a new commitment to responsibility for one's present. Philosophically, the concepts are too sensible to be controversial."

Furthermore, I would suggest that we should view with caution the edits of unregistered IP editors on controversial subjects.

The Landmark Education article has been the subject of repeated edit wars and tendentious editing and is sorely in need of oversight from a non-partisan observer. DaveApter (talk) 17:52, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

???

Did you actually read the edit I made or are you just some kind of robot. As a representative of Wikipedia, I hereby ask you to cease and desist from posting any of my copyrighted works on your website, or on any other media. If you wish to discuss this issue (as I actually do), email me at wikipedia@gatunka.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattopia (talk • contribs) 21:32, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

OK, the first human I have found. I want to contact someone at Wikipedia or Wikimedia, or whatever the organization is, and resolve this issue. If you are not in that position, then give me the contact details of someone who is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattopia (talk • contribs) 21:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Autosigned by SineBot apparently. I want to talk by phone to someone who has authority. Is that you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattopia (talk • contribs) 21:47, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

I just want to resolve this issue. Can you stop blocking me with robots (just look at my talk page). This is original content, in breach of the copyright law. Give me a phone number or an email address, or at least an on-line way to find someone who can deal with this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattopia (talk • contribs) 21:54, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Your Accidental Revert

That's alright mate, don't worry about it! That's why Wikipedia's great, if you make a mistake you can just go back :P I appreciate you taking the time to notify me though! Thanks for fixing it, too :) --RazorICE 06:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC)