Talk:List of future Interstate Highways: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
Is this referenced somewhere or is this a joke? By definition, it would be a spur of I-1 (which doesn't exist) <font face="arial, sans" color="#990000"><strong><em>DAWG</em></strong></font><font face="arial,sans' color=">in</font><font face="arial, sans" color="#000000"><strong>Roswell</strong></font> 03:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC) |
Is this referenced somewhere or is this a joke? By definition, it would be a spur of I-1 (which doesn't exist) <font face="arial, sans" color="#990000"><strong><em>DAWG</em></strong></font><font face="arial,sans' color=">in</font><font face="arial, sans" color="#000000"><strong>Roswell</strong></font> 03:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
* I-101 was proposed by some as a highway basically connecting Philadelphia, PA to Norfolk, VA directly along the Delmarva Peninsula. It does not exist, it hasn't even been formally proposed - it's just a suggested number (roughly analagous to US Highway 101, which likewise is numbered as if it's an auxiliary of US 1, but is considered a main highway in its own right instead). The reason 101 was picked is because 99 and 97 are already in use; the highest two-digit odd number not already in use is, in fact, 67. 101 makes more sense than 67 does, even if it makes less sense, numerically, than renumbering existing 97 (x95) and/or 99 (x80), and then using that freed up number to use for the Delmarva corridor. ~~ |
Revision as of 19:56, 2 November 2008
Template:U.S. Interstate Highway WikiProject
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on October 10, 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
Name
I have moved this back to the version with the H capitalized, as the term seems to be Interstate Highway, not Interstate highway. --SPUI (talk) 02:20, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Are Interstate highways going to fall out of the alignment scheme in the future with all these ooa interstates (e.g. I-99 and I-3)? --SuperDude 04:24, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, and they'll get major potholes while doing so. A few large cracks in the longer ones. --SPUI (talk) 05:04, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
How about the proposed I-69 corridor from the Mexican border in Texas all the way to the Canadian border in Michigan? --PeterR 17:38, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- This page is meant for newly proposed numbers, though I can see the point of including those too. Probably just as a short mention of each with a link to the main article for more. --SPUI (talk) 19:00, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I've seen at least three other serious proposals for Interstate 67 in Indiana, Michigan, and Alabama (http://www.interstate-guide.com/future.html#067 ); it would make sense to mention them all here; the Pennsylvania proposal is not etched in stone as of yet. Mhking (talk) 21:11, 21 Nov 2005 (EST)
- Agreed - and those are much better proposals too (and both could co-exist as a northern and southern I-67). The northeast I-67 would seriously fall out of the grid (and IMO, it is poorly placed - a better route would take it via US-22/322 and US-15). CrazyC83 23:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
City Lists
Personally, I think that the city lists are not necessary in this article; they are conjecture at best. As a result, unless we can get some consensus otherwise, I'm going to remove the lists. --Mhking 17:47, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Inclusion of Certain Route Segments on Interstate System
I can't find this specific text anywhere in the U.S. code. [1] --NE2 20:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Legislation paragraph
I reworked this paragraph (2nd one). It does not need to recite SAFETEA-LU or any other bill to get the point across. Other bills can be included there as well. -Fnlayson 00:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Interstate 22
I found http://birmingham.bizjournals.com/birmingham/stories/2003/07/21/daily43.html relating to I-22 and Corridor X. That news site has quite a bit of information about it; searching "Interstate 22" or "Corridor X" will turn up quite a few results. (→vishwin60 - new age roads) 16:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Move
This article was moved to "List of proposed Interstate Highways". I don't think it is a list. It has some short sections, but that's not like a list. Also, there was no discussion on that. So I moved it back. -Fnlayson 22:52, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
I-101???
Where is it???
Is this referenced somewhere or is this a joke? By definition, it would be a spur of I-1 (which doesn't exist) DAWGinRoswell 03:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- I-101 was proposed by some as a highway basically connecting Philadelphia, PA to Norfolk, VA directly along the Delmarva Peninsula. It does not exist, it hasn't even been formally proposed - it's just a suggested number (roughly analagous to US Highway 101, which likewise is numbered as if it's an auxiliary of US 1, but is considered a main highway in its own right instead). The reason 101 was picked is because 99 and 97 are already in use; the highest two-digit odd number not already in use is, in fact, 67. 101 makes more sense than 67 does, even if it makes less sense, numerically, than renumbering existing 97 (x95) and/or 99 (x80), and then using that freed up number to use for the Delmarva corridor. ~~