Jump to content

Talk:Tissue expansion: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Dsav (talk | contribs)
m →‎Self-promotion: new section
Line 22: Line 22:


[[Special:Contributions/4.242.171.119|4.242.171.119]] ([[User talk:4.242.171.119|talk]]) 21:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Anon.
[[Special:Contributions/4.242.171.119|4.242.171.119]] ([[User talk:4.242.171.119|talk]]) 21:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Anon.

== Self-promotion ==

I've reverted this article to remove the self-promotional/original research edits made by Hairlossmatters. [[User:Dsav|Dsav]] ([[User talk:Dsav|talk]]) 03:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:17, 14 November 2008

WikiProject iconMedicine Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.


Breast tissue expansion

I'm rather concerned about this section that has recently been added by a user whose only contributions are to add this website and its product to articles.

I don't consider the web site of the manufacturer to be a reliable source, and a quick google search didn't show up any reliable sources to show that this technique is real.

It looks about on par with enlarging a penis using a penis pump (that article also contains unreferenced statements) or using herbal pills or creams to try to increase bust size.

I'm assuming good faith for now and leaving it in the article, but if a reliable source cannot be found, I would have to conclude that it is a hoax or spam and remove it. --AliceJMarkham (talk) 01:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest putting a short time limit on it (a week or so?) and if nothing is produced strike it to talk page as removed as spam without reliable sources. Wikipedia needs to stay out of consumer fraud compromises. Benjiboi 17:26, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like NawlinWiki has made the decision and removed it as spam. I'm fine with that. --AliceJMarkham (talk) 22:19, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Innervation of new skin

I've always wondered if stretching to make new skin results in new nerves (all the way to the brain) and touch sensors or does the skin in effect become less sensitive, having less resolution as the spaces between touch sensors grow? Perhaps whether or not this is possible would be a good add to the article.

4.242.171.119 (talk) 21:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Anon.[reply]

Self-promotion

I've reverted this article to remove the self-promotional/original research edits made by Hairlossmatters. Dsav (talk) 03:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]