User talk:Damiens.rf: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 2d) to User talk:Damiens.rf/Archive 1. |
→Deletion: new section |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
[[User:Sennen goroshi|Sennen goroshi]] ([[User talk:Sennen goroshi|talk]]) 14:11, 13 November 2008 (UTC) |
[[User:Sennen goroshi|Sennen goroshi]] ([[User talk:Sennen goroshi|talk]]) 14:11, 13 November 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Deletion == |
|||
Delete Microphone Gaffe? Silly newbie, remember that Wikipedia is supposed to be about containing all the important information of the world and if you think the examples cited in that article aren't important then you are very much mistaken |
|||
Revision as of 00:05, 16 November 2008
This talk page is not a battle ground
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 2 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Image listed for deletion
In reply to your listing the image Image:Johan Helsingius.jpg for deletion: the original copyright message has been added with an added explanation on the copyright status. Please also see the comment on the Images and media for deletion page.
This should satisfy the standing guidelines, please un-list the image for deletion.
review
please review the article V (programming language)
Headset
As per my edit summary, the image is of a prominent Australian Politician wearing a headset for broadcast, NOT a headset for telephone or computer. The article is not about the former type of headset, not the latter - it doesn't matter how "nice" the image is, it is not an appropriate representation of the subject of the article. It is also not about the politician in question. Please try to keep the images you add to articles in-context, as I have asked you before. ABVS1936 (talk) 07:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- The two are entirely distinct. I'm not entirely sure that the image should be in the Headset section of the Headphone article as that section links to the main article of Headset (telephone/computer). My concern is also that the actual subject of the image - John Bannon - has nothing to do with either topic. ABVS1936 (talk) 06:52, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- No, it doesn't say that anywhere. However we ARE allowed to use tact and common sense. As I said earlier, my main concern is that the image is in no way related to the article - the article being about headsets for telephone or computer, and the image being that of a politician wearing a broadcast headset. ABVS1936 (talk) 05:34, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Paterson Bridge
Please don't remove a provided source for an image. That you'd remove it when provided after nominating it for deletion smells of bad faith, and is not a good look. Rebecca (talk) 10:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- The "provided source" was a broken link. The it was provided by a single purpose account smells suspect to me. --Damiens.rf 10:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Gwen Araujo
we both seem to be getting constantly reverted on the above article, for the record I do agree with your deletion of some of the more memorial style websites that are linked there.
I don't want to see anyone blocked over this, any suggestions on how to solve this little drama?
Sennen goroshi (talk) 14:11, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Deletion
Delete Microphone Gaffe? Silly newbie, remember that Wikipedia is supposed to be about containing all the important information of the world and if you think the examples cited in that article aren't important then you are very much mistaken