Jump to content

Talk:Flame spread: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Kilmer-san (talk | contribs)
Chem cat?
 
Sebastian (talk | contribs)
→‎Chem cat?: which template?
Line 1: Line 1:
==Chem cat?==
==Chem cat?==
I don't beleive this is a chemistry stub, or in that Catagory. Yes, it involves combustion, but from that generalized stance, anything involving fire would be a part of chemistry. COmbustion is chemisrty, but the hazards presented in full scale structure fires is not. I think this is more appropriately catagorized under construction, fire protection, or fire fighting. Comments? [[User:Kilmer-san|Kilmer-san]] ([[User talk:Kilmer-san|talk]]) 18:21, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
I don't beleive this is a chemistry stub, or in that Catagory. Yes, it involves combustion, but from that generalized stance, anything involving fire would be a part of chemistry. COmbustion is chemisrty, but the hazards presented in full scale structure fires is not. I think this is more appropriately catagorized under construction, fire protection, or fire fighting. Comments? [[User:Kilmer-san|Kilmer-san]] ([[User talk:Kilmer-san|talk]]) 18:21, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

: I see your point. Of the areas you list, I think fire protection and construction could be good fits. But which stub templates would you use concretely? (Here's our [[WP:STUBS|menu]].) Another one I can think of would be [[:Category:Civil engineering stubs]]. -- [[User:Sebastian|Sebastian]] ([[User talk:Sebastian|talk]]) 00:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:43, 17 November 2008

Chem cat?

I don't beleive this is a chemistry stub, or in that Catagory. Yes, it involves combustion, but from that generalized stance, anything involving fire would be a part of chemistry. COmbustion is chemisrty, but the hazards presented in full scale structure fires is not. I think this is more appropriately catagorized under construction, fire protection, or fire fighting. Comments? Kilmer-san (talk) 18:21, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. Of the areas you list, I think fire protection and construction could be good fits. But which stub templates would you use concretely? (Here's our menu.) Another one I can think of would be Category:Civil engineering stubs. -- Sebastian (talk) 00:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]