Jump to content

Talk:Josephson effect: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Marudubshinki (talk | contribs)
comment on practical uselessness of article
Line 7: Line 7:
==?==
==?==
There is nothing about what all this ''means''! I mean, it explains the technical parts, gives the proof, shows the equation which is all well and good, but I came beause I heard it was being used in ultra-fast chip portotypes, and the page gives me nada. --[[User:marudubshinki | Maru Dubshinki]]
There is nothing about what all this ''means''! I mean, it explains the technical parts, gives the proof, shows the equation which is all well and good, but I came beause I heard it was being used in ultra-fast chip portotypes, and the page gives me nada. --[[User:marudubshinki | Maru Dubshinki]]

I think the writer could only benefit from understanding the physical principles behind the Josephson effect, before engaging in the trivia of applications, which sadly risk becoming nothing but a mindless tabulation of data, without the deeper understanding, which lately seems to have become a dirty word. Certainly the applications are humanly and economically very important, but please spare us from having the applications promoted and discussed by fast Eddy, and other busybodies who are too eager to talk about some reality using a few memorized buzzwords, but are incapable of doing anything useful with that reality.

Revision as of 10:12, 12 October 2005

There isn't a single word about practical uses or its generic significance to further advancing physics. I mean Nobel prizes are awarded for achievements beneficial to the mankind, abstract beauty is not enough.


Maybe his psychic quantum theory powers affected the judges enough to nominate him?


?

There is nothing about what all this means! I mean, it explains the technical parts, gives the proof, shows the equation which is all well and good, but I came beause I heard it was being used in ultra-fast chip portotypes, and the page gives me nada. -- Maru Dubshinki

I think the writer could only benefit from understanding the physical principles behind the Josephson effect, before engaging in the trivia of applications, which sadly risk becoming nothing but a mindless tabulation of data, without the deeper understanding, which lately seems to have become a dirty word. Certainly the applications are humanly and economically very important, but please spare us from having the applications promoted and discussed by fast Eddy, and other busybodies who are too eager to talk about some reality using a few memorized buzzwords, but are incapable of doing anything useful with that reality.