User talk:Fantasia 15: Difference between revisions
Fantasia 15 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Fantasia 15 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:As I said above, the place to make your arguments for keeping the article is at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stevanna Jackson  (2nd nomination)]]. I'd suggest you read [[WP:BIO]] first so you can make the strongest possible argument there. I would be thrilled if you can show how this article meets (or can be made to meet) the requirements of [[WP:BIO]] -- Wikipedia is better when we have quality, well-written, sourced articles that meet the guidelines. But please make that argument at the correct place.--[[User:Fabrictramp|<font color="#960018" face="comic sans ms">Fabrictramp</font>]] | [[User talk:Fabrictramp|<font color="#960018" face="Papyrus">talk to me</font>]] 13:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC) |
:As I said above, the place to make your arguments for keeping the article is at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stevanna Jackson  (2nd nomination)]]. I'd suggest you read [[WP:BIO]] first so you can make the strongest possible argument there. I would be thrilled if you can show how this article meets (or can be made to meet) the requirements of [[WP:BIO]] -- Wikipedia is better when we have quality, well-written, sourced articles that meet the guidelines. But please make that argument at the correct place.--[[User:Fabrictramp|<font color="#960018" face="comic sans ms">Fabrictramp</font>]] | [[User talk:Fabrictramp|<font color="#960018" face="Papyrus">talk to me</font>]] 13:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC) |
||
==Speedy deletion of [[:Stevanna Jackson]]== |
|||
[[Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg|48px|left]] A tag has been placed on [[:Stevanna Jackson]], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#G4|section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a [[Wikipedia:Deletion debates|deletion debate]], such as at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]]. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. |
|||
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:Stevanna Jackson|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:Stevanna Jackson|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-repost-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Fabrictramp|<font color="#960018" face="comic sans ms">Fabrictramp</font>]] | [[User talk:Fabrictramp|<font color="#960018" face="Papyrus">talk to me</font>]] 00:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:14, 23 November 2008
I oppose this deletion. It may need some HTML adjustments, but beyond that, all of the information inthis article are true and correct.
- Veracity isn't the issue, notability is. However, you'll make more headway if you make your argument at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stevanna Jackson (2nd nomination).--Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Dear Fabrictramp,
Although, your point is well taken, I feel compelled to point out that notability is open to many different interpetations ... what you may consider notable, I may not consider notable or remarkable, thus Notability is and can be construed as subjective. Under the articles for deletion, one should not base their opinion on their own personal biases or preferences ... which undoubtedly makes a tremendous amount of other articles on Wikipedia trivial & indiscriminate.
- Wikipedia has a standard for notability, which you can read at WP:Notability and WP:BIO. These are not my personal standards, but the consensus of many thousands of editors. If you disagree with those standards, the place to take it up is on those talk pages.
- As to "why the other hosts from The Disney movie surfers are notable enough to have their own wiki", WP:OTHERSTUFF might be an instructive read.
- As I said above, the place to make your arguments for keeping the article is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stevanna Jackson (2nd nomination). I'd suggest you read WP:BIO first so you can make the strongest possible argument there. I would be thrilled if you can show how this article meets (or can be made to meet) the requirements of WP:BIO -- Wikipedia is better when we have quality, well-written, sourced articles that meet the guidelines. But please make that argument at the correct place.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Stevanna Jackson
A tag has been placed on Stevanna Jackson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC)