User talk:Pvkeller: Difference between revisions
m Added {{tilde}} note. |
→cold fusion controversy: new section |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your posts]] by typing four [[tilde]]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!<!-- Template:Tilde --> --[[User:SineBot|SineBot]] ([[User talk:SineBot|talk]]) 16:15, 8 November 2008 (UTC) |
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your posts]] by typing four [[tilde]]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!<!-- Template:Tilde --> --[[User:SineBot|SineBot]] ([[User talk:SineBot|talk]]) 16:15, 8 November 2008 (UTC) |
||
== cold fusion controversy == |
|||
Paul, you recently raised some points on the [[cold fusion]] talk page. You said that you would become interested in the topic when repeatibility is better and excess heat larger, i.e. when the scientific controversy is resolved. I also wish for this progress to happen. You then say that, until it happens, you'll see CF as a very convincing case of pathological science. May I suggest that this conclusion is a sign of [[pseudoskepticism]] ? The 2004 DOE was careful to not fall into that trap, and our article should not either. [[User:Pcarbonn|Pcarbonn]] ([[User talk:Pcarbonn|talk]]) 09:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:03, 30 November 2008
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:15, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
cold fusion controversy
Paul, you recently raised some points on the cold fusion talk page. You said that you would become interested in the topic when repeatibility is better and excess heat larger, i.e. when the scientific controversy is resolved. I also wish for this progress to happen. You then say that, until it happens, you'll see CF as a very convincing case of pathological science. May I suggest that this conclusion is a sign of pseudoskepticism ? The 2004 DOE was careful to not fall into that trap, and our article should not either. Pcarbonn (talk) 09:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)