User talk:67.18.109.218: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Urging you to get a username |
OH NO! PLEASE DON'T! GET A LIFE! This is my talk page, and I'm removing whatever I feel like. If you allow others to do this, then let me do the same. No policies are being broken. Prove it. |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
which I will have to wade though before I can respond. |
which I will have to wade though before I can respond. |
||
Also, I see that you filed an |
Also, I see that you filed an RFC against Gamaliel. Since you are |
||
fairly new I will remind you of the following: :''In order to remain |
fairly new I will remind you of the following: :''In order to remain |
||
listed at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment]], at least two people |
listed at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment]], at least two people |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
You claim you are acting on behalf of consensus but this is simply not true. Please read and participate in the talk page discussion instead of claiming that the consensus is what you want it to be. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 18:00, 11 August 2005 (UTC) |
You claim you are acting on behalf of consensus but this is simply not true. Please read and participate in the talk page discussion instead of claiming that the consensus is what you want it to be. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 18:00, 11 August 2005 (UTC) |
||
== Block == |
|||
You have been blocked for 24 hours for leaving vulgar personal attacks on my user talk page and that of [[User:Ruy Lopez]]. I see from your edit history that this isn't the first time you've left such nasty messages. Perhaps now you will get the hint that they are inappropriate. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 19:04, 11 August 2005 (UTC) |
|||
== Reverts == |
|||
Please be aware of and adhere to [[Wikipedia:Three revert rule]]. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 16:42, 14 August 2005 (UTC) |
|||
== my talk page == |
|||
I told you to stay off my talk page unless you have something constructive to say. Post that same comment for a fourth time and you get blocked for vandalism. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 17:54, 14 August 2005 (UTC) |
|||
== Vandalism of [[Talk:Joe Scarborough]] == |
|||
I've blocked you again for your vandalism of this page, specifically removing votes by Sterling Newberry and Calton. Your past behavior on this page - like inserting comments about "smearing feces" on people who vote in a way you disagree with - leaves no doubt that this was not accidental. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 16:14, 15 August 2005 (UTC) |
|||
== Block == |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Douche_Bag&diff=prev&oldid=21241183 This] bit of vandalism has gotten you a third block. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 21:08, 17 August 2005 (UTC) |
|||
:: It wasn't vandalism, its the truth. How long is this block for? |
|||
:::72 hours. The blocks get larger each time you vandalize Wikipedia. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 21:18, 17 August 2005 (UTC) |
|||
== Page protection == |
|||
I have protected this page as you have been removing messages and using it as a forum for insults. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 21:23, 17 August 2005 (UTC) |
|||
I am also extending your block due to your continuing violation of Wikipedia policies. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 21:37, 17 August 2005 (UTC) |
|||
I'm going to unblock your user talk page now. Please play nicely or you will be blocked again. This means no personal attacks, no [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joe_Scarborough&diff=prev&oldid=21886208 misleading edit summaries], no changing other people's comments on the talk page, or anything else remotely annoying. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 19:03, 26 August 2005 (UTC) |
|||
You've been blocked again for your personal attacks and disruption. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 23:11, 26 August 2005 (UTC) |
|||
==Uptown girl== |
|||
What Gamaliel fail's to realize is the fact that "Uptown Girl" is a Billy Joel song. [[User:67.18.109.218|67.18.109.218]] 22:32, 26 August 2005 (UTC) |
|||
==Block warning== |
|||
Er, is trolling user pages and making personal attacks and hiding the warning messages on your talk page the only kind of edit you're here to make? None of those help build an encyclopedia, they hinder it. Make one more like that and I'll block you. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 19:42, 10 September 2005 (UTC) |
|||
== Not Stirling Newberry == |
|||
I am not Stirling Newberry. I don't appreciate the "sockpuppet" accusation and editing of my User page. Don't do it again. --[[User:Astanhope|AStanhope]] 17:21, 14 September 2005 (UTC) |
|||
==Do not blank pages== |
|||
Please stop removing content from Wikipedia that people have worked hard to create. It is considered [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. If you want to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you. [[User:Hall Monitor|Hall Monitor]] 17:12, 14 October 2005 (UTC) |
|||
== Anonymous editor talk pages == |
|||
If you would like to have user and talk pages of your own, I recommend strongly getting a Wikipedia user name and account. It's free and it's easy; just click the Log In/Create Account button up in the top right of your screen. |
|||
Because there isn't a single specific editor associated with a given IP address, you don't enjoy the same privileges with respect to erasing talk page messages here. [[User:TenOfAllTrades|TenOfAllTrades]]([[User_talk:TenOfAllTrades|talk]]) 00:32, 15 October 2005 (UTC) |
|||
== Urging you to get a username == |
|||
Please, consider getting a username. It's extremely easy, and requires neither cash nor an email address. You can go to [[Special:Userlogin]] to set one up right now. |
|||
Other editors tend to be more willing to cooperate with someone who isn't hidden by the anonymity of an IP address, and you will enjoy a much greater degree of control over your User and User Talk pages. [[User:TenOfAllTrades|TenOfAllTrades]]([[User_talk:TenOfAllTrades|talk]]) 00:43, 15 October 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:45, 15 October 2005
In response to the message you left on my page I have begun looking into matter. Gamaliel does seem to be involved in a number of edit wars and his manner of dealing with certain anonymous users is interesting. There is a huge paper trail associated with this mess which I will have to wade though before I can respond.
Also, I see that you filed an RFC against Gamaliel. Since you are fairly new I will remind you of the following: :In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute, not different disputes. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 22:42, 29 July 2005 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. So you will need someone to support you or it will be deleted. And that may be for the best. Gamaliel is now discussing the Joe Scarborough situation at Talk:Joe Scarborough so the issue may be resolving itself.--Heathcliff 23:18, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
You claim you are acting on behalf of consensus but this is simply not true. Please read and participate in the talk page discussion instead of claiming that the consensus is what you want it to be. Gamaliel 18:00, 11 August 2005 (UTC)