User talk:Baseball Bugs/Snapshot100130: Difference between revisions
Bigbluefish (talk | contribs) m →Political cranks: i can has spelign? |
EagleScout18 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 204: | Line 204: | ||
Your work on these political articles is really valued, but I thought I ought to point out this outsider's view of the way things are going so you might become a little less troll-o-magnetic. Cheers! [[User:Bigbluefish|Bigbluefish]] ([[User talk:Bigbluefish|talk]]) 17:47, 3 December 2008 (UTC) |
Your work on these political articles is really valued, but I thought I ought to point out this outsider's view of the way things are going so you might become a little less troll-o-magnetic. Cheers! [[User:Bigbluefish|Bigbluefish]] ([[User talk:Bigbluefish|talk]]) 17:47, 3 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
==Request== |
|||
I'd actually prefer you address the issues, rather than me personally, going forward. Thanks in advance. [[User:EagleScout18|EagleScout18]] ([[User talk:EagleScout18|talk]]) 21:54, 3 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:54, 3 December 2008
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article nor the talk page for an encyclopedia article. Be aware that if you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mindless parrot. Be aware that the page may be inundated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself, if that. Be aware that this user likes to say "Be aware that..." Be aware that the original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Baseball_Bugs/Snapshot100130. |
Useful warnings
Vandalism warnings
|
Proposed change to warning boxes inspired by another editor [1]
a compliant has been opended regarding youse behavieurs on WP:ANI. Please refrain from subtle vnadlaism.
No matter how subltel you think youa rebing you can e suiqt secertian that you are still commiting an act of vandlaism.
if you merely need an d outlet to practice editing please see WP:SANDBOX DINTRSTEAD of mutiliating articles on the mainspace ot violating articles here on wikipedia.
I hope you will return to make many mroe sponstructive edits in the future.
IF you require a sponsor, please see WP:SPONSOR to assit you in making many better editors into the near
future.
Now, who can argue with that?
Not only is it authentic internet gibberish, but it expresses a courage that is little seen in this day and age.
Spam warnings
3RR warnings
Transients welcome
Letters from fans
BASEBALLS BUGS IS AN UGLY IGNORANT FOOL —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.49.166.166 (talk) 23:09, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Limbaugh is sc##
Hi BBugs, I know you aren't a fan of Limbaugh, but do you need to bring him into discussions about others? The logic that Limbaugh hasn't done something, so there isn't anything to it is sort of weird. Anyways, carry on :) --Tom 21:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Barack Obama
The following are the contents of a .DOC file that I have copied and pasted and then uploaded to your specific talk page. The reason for this is not to cause ‘disruption,’ or to perpetuate an ‘urban myth’ or ‘urban legend,’ but rather to set the record straight.
The Constitution of the United States of America Article I, Section II states:
“No person except a natural born Citizen, or Citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.”
Source: http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articleii.html
We know he has gone by the names of Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barack Dunham, and Barry Dunham.
Source: http://www.wnd.com/images/ObamaIndonesia.jpg
The image referenced lists Barry Soetoro as an Indonesian Citizen who was born in Honolulu Hawaii on 4-AUG-1961. His religion is listed as Muslim. The AP has confirmed that is a genuine photo.
But there is a problem with that:
Source: http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/UPDATE/misc2008/ChicagoTribune-ObamaLtr-Nov-2008.pdf
“You have posted on the Internet an unsigned, forged and thoroughly discredited, computer-generated birth form created in 2007, a form that lacks vital information found on any original, hand signed Certificate of Live Birth, such as hospital address, signature of attending physician and age of mother.”
“ • Hawaii Dept of Health will not confirm your assertion that you were born in Hawaii. • Legal affidavits state you were born in Kenya. • Your grandmother is recorded on tape saying she attended your birth in Kenya. • U.S. Law in effect in 1961 denied U.S. citizenship to any child born in Kenya if the father was Kenyan and the mother was not yet 19 years of age. • In 1965, your mother legally relinquished whatever Kenyan or U.S. citizenship she and you had by marrying an Indonesian and becoming a naturalized Indonesian citizen.
The most important two points are the last two. According to United States law in 1961, US Citizenship was denied to any child born in Kenya if the father was Kenyan and the mother was not yet 19.
And, in 1965 his mother legally relinquished whatever Kenyan or US Citizenship she (and he) had by marrying an Indonesian and becoming a naturalized Indonesian Citizen.
These are distruptions? These are ‘urban myths?’ These are facts.
However, so as not to be “disruptive,” I have posted these to your talk pages.
Happy Trails! --Dr. Entropy (talk) 03:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- This belongs with the alligators in the sewers. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 06:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello Baseball Bugs. Please see my comments in the general comments section of that RFA, as it pertains to your neutral vote. Thank you. --Deskana (talk) 08:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Political cranks
Hi Bugs,
Political cranks are political cranks but maybe take it easy with the more animated namecalling against the far right. While there's nothing too unWikipedian about expressing what I'd call fairly left-wing (or certainly anti-right) views to shoot down efforts at swaying from NPOV to CPOV, it makes it harder for the people you're addressing to see that the version of the article that you're advocating doesn't contain the "Rush Slimeball"-type remarks you use as counter-argument. Particularly with Rush, it's slipping from sounding like counter-argumentative humour to irrational trivialising of the right wing community.
Your work on these political articles is really valued, but I thought I ought to point out this outsider's view of the way things are going so you might become a little less troll-o-magnetic. Cheers! Bigbluefish (talk) 17:47, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Request
I'd actually prefer you address the issues, rather than me personally, going forward. Thanks in advance. EagleScout18 (talk) 21:54, 3 December 2008 (UTC)