User talk:JHP: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:01, 12 December 2008

Palin

Thanks very much for the heads up. I fixed it. Sorry abuot the error.Ferrylodge (talk) 02:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The ABX request

Yo, I asked if you would ABX some samples not for the sake of the article but cuz I was curious to see the results. I've been meaning to look for an audiophile who vigorously challenges the popularity of the 128 kbps preference and see if he can easily tell the difference from a properly encoded 128 kbps file and the original.

Tell me if you accept my challenge and I'll send you 4 wavs, (the original, one low bitrate output, one high bitrate output and 128 kbps output.) Download the ABXer here. (No pressure on giving it accurate ratings, just ABX at least 10x)--70.65.229.62 (talk) 14:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 ==Palin==
 Thanks very much for the heads up.  I fixed it.  Sorry abuot the error.[[User:Ferrylodge|Ferrylodge]] ([[User talk:Ferrylodge|talk]]) 02:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
+== The ABX request ==
+Yo, I asked if you would ABX some samples not for the sake of the article but cuz I was curious to see the results. I've been meaning to look for an audiophile who vigorously challenges the popularity of the 128 kbps preference and see if he can easily tell the difference from a '''properly encoded''' 128 kbps file and the original.
+Tell me if you accept my challenge and I'll send you 4 wavs, (the original, one low bitrate output, one high bitrate output and 128 kbps output.) Download the ABXer [http://www.listening-tests.info/mp3-128-1/results.htm here.] (No pressure on giving it accurate ratings, just ABX at least 10x)--[[Special:Contributions/70.65.229.62|70.65.229.62]] ([[User talk:70.65.229.62|talk]]) 14:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)