User talk:The Legendary Shadow!: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:09, 19 December 2008

Frustration

Please don't let the actions of a few users discourage you from contributing here. Your efforts are appreciated, and necessary if Wikipedia is going to represent a greater reality than the wishes of just a few users. The Jade Knight (talk) 18:01, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments, but I have been following that particular article since the start of the trouble, and the source of the truble is one user in particular; it is obvious from the history of the article that he is behind it, hand yet no action has been taken.

Terms of your unblock

Apparently, user talk:Richard Rolles was deleted. I'll re-state the terms of my unblock: "Per our discussion via e-mail, I have decided to unblock you. You will remain unblocked, permitted that you refrain from editing Scientology-related articles, unless in cases of strictly defined vandalism." Yes, I know the userspace and Wikipedia namespaces are not articles, so let me make myself even clearer. Do not edit Scientology-related articles, unless in cases of strictly defined vandalism, participate in Scientology-related discussions, post rants about Scientology editors in your userspace, or any other activities involving Scientology in any userspace. If you fail to meet this condition, I will have no choice but to reblock you indefinitely. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 04:12, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that, Nishkid, and I have not touched any Scientology articles since. I wanted to comment on the RfA, as I have seen first hand examples of the kind of problem they want to sort out. And rather than do it in th RfA, I thought it perhaps better to do it on my userspace. I have removed my 'rant' as you would call it from my userspace now. BTW, could you clarify 'except in cases of strictly defined vandalism' for me? I take that to mean, if I saw someone for example removing properly sourced material, then I woiuld be OK to put it back in?The Legendary Shadow! (talk) 16:49, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 16:49, 19 December 2008 edit The Legendary Shadow! (talk \| contribs) 152 edits →‎Terms of your unblock ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:09, 19 December 2008 edit undo The Legendary Shadow! (talk \| contribs) 152 edits →‎Terms of your unblock Next edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Apparently, [[user talk:Richard Rolles]] was deleted. I'll re-state the terms of my unblock: "Per our discussion via e-mail, I have decided to unblock you. You will remain unblocked, permitted that you refrain from editing Scientology-related articles, unless in cases of strictly defined [[WP:VAND\|vandalism]]." Yes, I know the userspace and Wikipedia namespaces are not articles, so let me make myself even clearer. Do not edit Scientology-related articles, unless in cases of strictly defined [[WP:VAND\|vandalism]], participate in Scientology-related discussions, post rants about Scientology editors in your userspace, or any other activities involving Scientology in any userspace. If you fail to meet this condition, I will have no choice but to reblock you indefinitely. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64\|Nishkid64]] </span><sub>([[User talk:Nishkid64\|Make articles, not wikidrama]])</sub> 04:12, 19 December 2008 (UTC)		Apparently, [[user talk:Richard Rolles]] was deleted. I'll re-state the terms of my unblock: "Per our discussion via e-mail, I have decided to unblock you. You will remain unblocked, permitted that you refrain from editing Scientology-related articles, unless in cases of strictly defined [[WP:VAND\|vandalism]]." Yes, I know the userspace and Wikipedia namespaces are not articles, so let me make myself even clearer. Do not edit Scientology-related articles, unless in cases of strictly defined [[WP:VAND\|vandalism]], participate in Scientology-related discussions, post rants about Scientology editors in your userspace, or any other activities involving Scientology in any userspace. If you fail to meet this condition, I will have no choice but to reblock you indefinitely. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64\|Nishkid64]] </span><sub>([[User talk:Nishkid64\|Make articles, not wikidrama]])</sub> 04:12, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

	I understand that, Nishkid, and I have not touched any Scientology articles since. I wanted to comment on the RfA, as I have seen first hand examples of the kind of problem they want to sort out. And rather than do it in th RfA, I thought it perhaps better to do it on my userspace.[[User:The Legendary Shadow!\|The Legendary Shadow!]] ([[User talk:The Legendary Shadow!#top\|talk]]) 16:49, 19 December 2008 (UTC)		I understand that, Nishkid, and I have not touched any Scientology articles since. I wanted to comment on the RfA, as I have seen first hand examples of the kind of problem they want to sort out. And rather than do it in th RfA, I thought it perhaps better to do it on my userspace. I have removed my 'rant' as you would call it from my userspace now. BTW, could you clarify 'except in cases of strictly defined vandalism' for me? I take that to mean, if I saw someone for example removing properly sourced material, then I woiuld be OK to put it back in?[[User:The Legendary Shadow!\|The Legendary Shadow!]] ([[User talk:The Legendary Shadow!#top\|talk]]) 16:49, 19 December 2008 (UTC)