User talk:Trillium608

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Integrated library system. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 01:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Three-Revert Rule violation

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Also, Wikipedia is not for you to promote your websites and products... repeatedly adding links will in most cases result in all of them being removed -- Wikipedia:Spam#External_link_spamming

Stop adding links to The Library Corporation. -- Raysonho (talk) 15:31, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

On links...

I merely removed external links which link to websites outside of Wikipedia, and which are not compliant with WP:EL, which is the guideline for how to add links to Wikipedia. SyrisDinix does not have any external links in the articles either. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 19:00, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Read WP:EL. Do not add links to websites outside of wikipedia if those links are not in line with policy. Thank you. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 19:13, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:07, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

You did not remove the external links - you removed all the copy - and deleted everyone else! You should have just removed the links - then I would understand. Many links were on there before I added us, so it was not clear what your request was. Now I understand. It's fine to leave ALL companies on there, but if you just want SirsiDynix to run a monopoly - fine - that is not what this site is about----Trillium608

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Violations of WP:EL and WP:SPAM and for WP:EDITWAR. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--Jayron32.talk.contribs 19:23, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Trillium608 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

63.119.22.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Trillium608". The reason given for Trillium608's block is: "Spamming links to external sites".

• Blocking administrator: Jayron32 (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: This is not an autoblock; you are directly blocked for edit-warring and spamming. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:10, 19 December 2008 (UTC)