Jump to content

User talk:Knowheretorun: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Hi and re 2012: That source probably isn't okay for Wikipedia
There's starting to be quite a bit there
Line 18: Line 18:
<br><br>
<br><br>
-- [[Special:Contributions/201.53.7.16|201.53.7.16]] ([[User talk:201.53.7.16|talk]]) 22:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
-- [[Special:Contributions/201.53.7.16|201.53.7.16]] ([[User talk:201.53.7.16|talk]]) 22:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)



::Unfortunately, your source http://nowheretorun.podomatic.com/entry/2008-11-01T10_42_05-07_00 is not, as far as I can tell, a "reliable source" for Wikipedia purposes. See [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]], especially [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_sources]]. Please note that this isn't ''my'' policy, it's Wikipedia's policy. -- [[Special:Contributions/201.53.7.16|201.53.7.16]] ([[User talk:201.53.7.16|talk]]) 22:39, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
::Unfortunately, your source http://nowheretorun.podomatic.com/entry/2008-11-01T10_42_05-07_00 is not, as far as I can tell, a "reliable source" for Wikipedia purposes. See [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]], especially [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_sources]]. Please note that this isn't ''my'' policy, it's Wikipedia's policy. -- [[Special:Contributions/201.53.7.16|201.53.7.16]] ([[User talk:201.53.7.16|talk]]) 22:39, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

:::Hmm. I'm starting to wonder if there isn't enough at [[2012#2012_Geophysical_and_Cosmological_speculations]] to justify spinning that off as a separate article (assuming that we can cite everything, clean up the <nowiki>{{who}}</nowiki> tags, etc. -- [[Special:Contributions/201.53.7.16|201.53.7.16]] ([[User talk:201.53.7.16|talk]]) 06:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:04, 3 January 2009

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Knowheretorun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! ~Richmond96 tc 05:25, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and re 2012

Hi, thanks for your post about 2012.
This article is currently "protected", which is normally a temporary measure used to provide a cooling-off period when an article is getting a rash of vandalism or when editors are fighting over it excessively. (See Wikipedia:Protection policy.) It's apparently been protected since 19 Nov 2008, which seems excessive to me. I posted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rational Skepticism asking somebody to de-protect it.
If this doesn't happen very soon I'll ask an administrator to do this, and unless there's some good reason for it to stay protected, all users should should be able to edit it then. (If there is some continuing problem with that article, it may be re-protected as necessary, however, as I say, this is normally supposed to be temporary.)
Also, AFAIK, a named account such as User:Knowheretorun (You :-) ) should be able to edit articles even while they're protected, but non-named ISP editors are blocked. If you're not already familiar with Wikipedia's standards for cites and reliable sources, you want to read those (WP:MOS) -- otherwise people are going to fairly quickly delete your edits anyway.

Also, when you post to Talk pages, it's good form to type four tildes ( ~~~~ ) after your post. This automatically signs your account name or ISP and gives a time signature, making it much easier to see who's saying what when.

-- 201.53.7.16 (talk) 22:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, your source http://nowheretorun.podomatic.com/entry/2008-11-01T10_42_05-07_00 is not, as far as I can tell, a "reliable source" for Wikipedia purposes. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources, especially Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_sources. Please note that this isn't my policy, it's Wikipedia's policy. -- 201.53.7.16 (talk) 22:39, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. I'm starting to wonder if there isn't enough at 2012#2012_Geophysical_and_Cosmological_speculations to justify spinning that off as a separate article (assuming that we can cite everything, clean up the {{who}} tags, etc. -- 201.53.7.16 (talk) 06:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]