Talk:Commemorative coins of Poland: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
←Created page with 'While adding market values based on Polish Numismatic Society's publication <ref name=PRICELIST_2008>{{cite journal |title=Cennik monet kolekcjonerskich | journal=...' |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
While adding market values based on Polish Numismatic Society's publication <ref name=PRICELIST_2008>{{cite journal |title=Cennik monet kolekcjonerskich | journal=Przegląd Numizmatyczny |publisher=Stowarzyszenie Numizmatyków Polskich|volume=63/2008 |issue=4 |pages=23–26 |year=2008 |issn=1231-143X |oclc=68734851 }}</ref> I found that in the publication, the quantity of the some coins differes from the offical values. It is probably error in print in the publication, but I've decided to put both numbers in the articles. |
While adding market values based on Polish Numismatic Society's publication <ref name=PRICELIST_2008>{{cite journal |title=Cennik monet kolekcjonerskich | journal=Przegląd Numizmatyczny |publisher=Stowarzyszenie Numizmatyków Polskich|volume=63/2008 |issue=4 |pages=23–26 |year=2008 |issn=1231-143X |oclc=68734851 }}</ref> I found that in the publication, the quantity of the some coins differes from the offical values. It is probably error in print in the publication, but I've decided to put both numbers in the articles. |
||
[[User:Kupsztal|Kupsztal]] ([[User talk:Kupsztal|talk]]) 23:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC) |
[[User:Kupsztal|Kupsztal]] ([[User talk:Kupsztal|talk]]) 23:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Wow Kupsztal, Well done, you have put a huge amount of work and effort into this article, adding in both quantities and referencing them is a great idea since official sources can sometimes be wrong.[[User:Kevin hipwell|Kevin hipwell]] ([[User talk:Kevin hipwell|talk]]) 11:34, 9 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Notes == |
== Notes == |
Revision as of 11:34, 9 January 2009
While adding market values based on Polish Numismatic Society's publication [1] I found that in the publication, the quantity of the some coins differes from the offical values. It is probably error in print in the publication, but I've decided to put both numbers in the articles. Kupsztal (talk) 23:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- Wow Kupsztal, Well done, you have put a huge amount of work and effort into this article, adding in both quantities and referencing them is a great idea since official sources can sometimes be wrong.Kevin hipwell (talk) 11:34, 9 January 2009 (UTC)