Jump to content

Talk:Nursing theory: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
" ...to boldly go, where no person has gone before." -StarTrek
" ...to boldly go, where no person has gone before." -StarTrek


I can't believe this is still a stub!. This topic has historically been a hotbed for flaming in the Nursing world. My plan is to flesh it out a bit, then recruit some grad students to tear into it. Hopefully, they will make something innovative and provocative.[[User:LeonardM|LeonardM]] 15:27, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
I can't believe this is still a stub!. This topic has historically been a hotbed for flaming in the Nursing world. My plan is to flesh it out a bit, then recruit some grad students to tear into it. Hopefully, they will make something innovative and provocative
User:LeonardM|LeonardM]] 15:27, 8 October 2005 (UTC)


Why rely on grad students? I'm a floor nurse with an interest in this area. My interest however is the controversy surrounding the perceived uselessness of nursing theory to actual practice. That's the area that I would want to flesh out. [[User:abulafia|abulafia]] 10:58, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Why rely on grad students? I'm a floor nurse with an interest in this area. My interest however is the controversy surrounding the perceived uselessness of nursing theory to actual practice. That's the area that I would want to flesh out. [[User:abulafia|abulafia]] 10:58, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:53, 9 January 2009

WikiProject iconMedicine Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Theory is not meant to be an exact truth and/or reality: it is intended to be an approximation & a tool to see new possibilities." Chin & Kramer, p. 125

Perhaps we should consider nursing theory from a larger perspective? All too often nurses relate "theory" to "thoerists." I would like to see content relating to evidence based nursing and how theory guides practice. It might be a good idea to include some discussion on ways of "knowing." Try reading Chinn & Kramer's "Integrating Knowledge Development in Nursing." They offer a great perspective to nursing theory.

Chin, P.L., & Kramer, M.K. (2004). Integrating Knowldedge Development in Nursing, 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

" ...to boldly go, where no person has gone before." -StarTrek

I can't believe this is still a stub!. This topic has historically been a hotbed for flaming in the Nursing world. My plan is to flesh it out a bit, then recruit some grad students to tear into it. Hopefully, they will make something innovative and provocative User:LeonardM|LeonardM]] 15:27, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Why rely on grad students? I'm a floor nurse with an interest in this area. My interest however is the controversy surrounding the perceived uselessness of nursing theory to actual practice. That's the area that I would want to flesh out. abulafia 10:58, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The list of "Major nursing theorists" is definitely lacking, and (while it isn't said explicitly) you get the impression that nursing theories and nursing models are the same thing. J

"It cannot be denied, however, that there is much vanity involved in the formulation of nursing theory." Granted I agree, but this is hardly unbiased. I'm going to go ahead and delete it from the mainn entry, but I'd love to see some more discussion. Sarah Waggoner (talk) 20:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]