User talk:71.91.49.242: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
←Created page with 'I should be noted that the comment that is stated on WTC Twin Towers 2 talk is not acurate. The It would appear he is making stuff up to defend hid statement. Have ...' |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I should be noted that the comment that is stated on WTC Twin Towers 2 talk is not acurate. The It would appear he is making stuff up to defend hid statement. Have hope, By the way I am involved with TTII and Kenneth Gardner. I kmow for a fact that the FT will be gone. Alos, starting on January 1 silverstien Properties will be charging the Port Authority 100,000 dollars per day due to a unfinshed wall segment. |
I should be noted that the comment that is stated on WTC Twin Towers 2 talk is not acurate. The It would appear he is making stuff up to defend hid statement. Have hope, By the way I am involved with TTII and Kenneth Gardner. I kmow for a fact that the FT will be gone. Alos, starting on January 1 silverstien Properties will be charging the Port Authority 100,000 dollars per day due to a unfinshed wall segment. |
||
That's incredible news. How can I trust you, though? I'm not downing you, it's just very hard taking this all in. [[Special:Contributions/71.91.49.242|71.91.49.242]] ([[User talk:71.91.49.242#top|talk]]) 01:34, 13 January 2009 (UTC)J |
Revision as of 01:34, 13 January 2009
I should be noted that the comment that is stated on WTC Twin Towers 2 talk is not acurate. The It would appear he is making stuff up to defend hid statement. Have hope, By the way I am involved with TTII and Kenneth Gardner. I kmow for a fact that the FT will be gone. Alos, starting on January 1 silverstien Properties will be charging the Port Authority 100,000 dollars per day due to a unfinshed wall segment.
That's incredible news. How can I trust you, though? I'm not downing you, it's just very hard taking this all in. 71.91.49.242 (talk) 01:34, 13 January 2009 (UTC)J