Jump to content

User talk:DerechoReguerraz: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 20: Line 20:


:: You desperately try to fight aren't you ?
:: You desperately try to fight aren't you ?
:: Your edit is plain wrong and does not make sens. You should know what you are doing before you do it.[[Special:Contributions/79.192.231.198|79.192.231.198]] ([[User talk:79.192.231.198|talk]]) 11:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
:: Your edit is plain wrong and does not make sens. You should know what you are doing before you do it.
:: EDIT: Ok since you are not seeing your failure I will make it more Clear to you ...
:: Look into ANY of the above articles and you will NOT see chinese as the root. Not since they are a chain of development your edit is not logic. ALL those aricles do not support your idea that it should be the root. The article [Chinese character]] does discibe the tree in more detailed words but has nothing to do with it. Another way to see this is to look at [[Arabic_alphabet]] where you can also see that the tree is build up from the dif. writing system periots. There is ONE bad template and 6 alone in that tree who say different and you change 4 of em. realy what should I ask else than "are you dumb?" if you do that twice.[[Special:Contributions/79.192.231.198|79.192.231.198]] ([[User talk:79.192.231.198|talk]]) 11:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


== Topkapı Palace ==
== Topkapı Palace ==

Revision as of 11:44, 19 January 2009

Parent systems

If you don't understand what a parent tree is than you should not change it. Just because I am not a user does not mean that I don't know what I am writing.

Look at Chinese character yourself and you will see that the Oracle script is the ROOT of Chinese and therefore Japanese (writig system).

The root of a language is not the final language itself ... Oo !

PS: You should read and know the stuff you are changing. If you would than you would know that Oracle Bone Script

Seal ScriptClerical ScriptRegular script (Kanji)

are all parts of the Chinese language dev. and that they build up into todays chinese. Therefor its wrong to name Chinese character anywhere in that tree as IT IS this thee itself.

Only because there are wrong templates here you don't need to spread them.

79.192.231.198 (talk) 11:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What you wrote is pretty much incoherent. Please use proper English grammer.--DerechoReguerraz (talk) 11:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You desperately try to fight aren't you ?
Your edit is plain wrong and does not make sens. You should know what you are doing before you do it.
EDIT: Ok since you are not seeing your failure I will make it more Clear to you ...
Look into ANY of the above articles and you will NOT see chinese as the root. Not since they are a chain of development your edit is not logic. ALL those aricles do not support your idea that it should be the root. The article [Chinese character]] does discibe the tree in more detailed words but has nothing to do with it. Another way to see this is to look at Arabic_alphabet where you can also see that the tree is build up from the dif. writing system periots. There is ONE bad template and 6 alone in that tree who say different and you change 4 of em. realy what should I ask else than "are you dumb?" if you do that twice.79.192.231.198 (talk) 11:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Topkapı Palace

hi there,

I have readded the listing of Topkapı Palace as World Heritage but updated the link that leads to it to make the point clear. sincerely Gryffindor 18:23, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]