Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sisters of the Poor Child Ziko: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 01:09, 28 January 2009

Keep

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+*'''Keep'''
-===[[Sisters of the Poor Child Ziko]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|}}
-:{{la|Sisters of the Poor Child Ziko}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Sisters of the Poor Child Ziko|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sisters of the Poor Child Ziko]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sisters of the Poor Child Ziko|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 January 27#{{anchorencode:Sisters of the Poor Child Ziko}}|View log]])</noinclude>
-Prod contested with the rationale, ''"It is a very small congregation only recently set up, it is unlikely that many will have heard of it."'' 'Nuff said. '''Delete.''' <span style="background:#CC1010;color:#FFA0A0">'''&nbsp;Blanchardb'''&nbsp;</span>-<small><sup><span style="color:#A62428">[[User:Blanchardb|Me]]•[[User Talk:Blanchardb|MyEars]]•[[Special:Contributions/Blanchardb|MyMouth]]</span></sup></small>- timed 02:12, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
-*'''Delete''' A Google search turns up nothing by that name. [[User:Pastor Theo|Pastor Theo]] ([[User talk:Pastor Theo|talk]]) 02:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
-*'''Delete''', not notable. '''[[User:Tavix|Tavix]]''' [[User talk:Tavix|(talk)]] 02:20, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
-*'''Keep''', its clearly not going to turn up on google search because it is a tiny congregation in north finchley run by fecking elderly Irish nuns (one of whom happens to be my aunt) that have no idea of the existence of the internet let alone the ability to set up a web page. Nuff Said.  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:D50qhx|D50qhx]] ([[User talk:D50qhx|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/D50qhx|contribs]]) 02:28, 27 January 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-**That's a reason for ''deleting'' the article, not keeping it. You see, Wikipedia refuses to be a primary source about anything. To get Wikipedia to keep the article, you have to show the congregation's [[WP:N|notability]], and the best way to do that is to find the very kind of [[WP:RS|coverage]] you are here claiming as nonexistent. --<span style="background:#CC1010;color:#FFA0A0">'''&nbsp;Blanchardb'''&nbsp;</span>-<small><sup><span style="color:#A62428">[[User:Blanchardb|Me]]•[[User Talk:Blanchardb|MyEars]]•[[Special:Contributions/Blanchardb|MyMouth]]</span></sup></small>- timed 02:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
-***Shall I send you a leaflet?  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:D50qhx|D50qhx]] ([[User talk:D50qhx|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/D50qhx|contribs]]) 02:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-:::* A leaflet would be a primary source.  You are probably in a better position than the rest of us to uncover [[WP:RS|reliable secondary source coverage]] of this congregation, and I urge you to do so in the time left before this AfD closes.  I think it's safe to say that if you cannot find reliable secondary sources to justify the article's existence, then no such sources will ever be found, in which case [[Wikipedia:DEL#Reasons_for_deletion|the article will have to be deleted]].  Please also consider the [[WP:ORG|notability standards for non-commercial organizations]], particularly for local organizations, when doing your referencing.  Thanks,   [[User:Baileypalblue|Baileypalblue]] ([[User talk:Baileypalblue|talk]]) 03:03, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
-*'''Delete''', fails [[WP:V]]. [[User:Punkmorten|Punkmorten]] ([[User talk:Punkmorten|talk]]) 09:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
-*'''Keep''', I know this place init. We pray for the poor child ziko. [[User:I am Emilio|I am Emilio]]  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment was added at 13:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> {{spa|I am Emilio}}
-*'''Keep''' Yeah I know this place too. Are you Emilio? [[User:Am I Massimo|Am I Massimo]] {{spa|Am I Massimo}}
-**Hmmm... that would explain the "no Emilio in sight" comment in the AfD nomination edit summary at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Evangelical_Free_Church_of_Canada&diff=266669462&oldid=262416879 Evangelical Free Church of Canada]. --<span style="background:#CC1010;color:#FFA0A0">'''&nbsp;Blanchardb'''&nbsp;</span>-<small><sup><span style="color:#A62428">[[User:Blanchardb|Me]]•[[User Talk:Blanchardb|MyEars]]•[[Special:Contributions/Blanchardb|MyMouth]]</span></sup></small>- timed 14:26, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
-*'''Delete''' as per D50qhx.  Comments here and removing the prod clearly indicate a total lack of notability. [[User:Edward321|Edward321]] ([[User talk:Edward321|talk]]) 14:46, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
-*'''Delete''' - The approval of the order's rule by Cardinal Murphy O'Connor should be easily traceable; the fact that nothing can be found suggests that this entire thing is a hoax, and should be speedily deleted. [[User:AlexTiefling|AlexTiefling]] ([[User talk:AlexTiefling|talk]]) 16:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
-*'''Delete''' almost certainly a hoax, and I almost speedied it yesterday as vandalism, on the evidence that the contributor had previously entered some very problematic contributions to [[St. Michael's Catholic Grammar School]] (that I think have all been reverted). Probably I should have done so, instead of prodding it. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 17:28, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
-*'''Delete''' Mild notability and has no references [[User:Ijanderson977|Ijanderson]] ([[User talk:Ijanderson977|talk]]) 22:46, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
-*'''Delete'''.  I did what I could with the article, but I do not think it is enough.  The article fails [[WP:V]], because I could find NO sources to verify the "Sisters of the Poor Child Ziko".  The bit about the Tyburn Convent has some truth to it, but even on that website I have not yet come across any mentions of "Sisters of the Poor Child Ziko".  I also suspect that some of the keep comments above may be from sock accounts.  Sincerely, --[[User:A Nobody|A Nobody]]<sup>''[[User talk:A Nobody|My talk]]''</sup> 23:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)