Jump to content

The Devil in Dover: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
The book explores the behind-the-scenes events that led to the filing of a lawsuit by Tammy Kitzmiller and ten other parents in Dover, Pennsylvania in 2005 and covers the events of the trial up to and after the verdict for the plaintiffs by Judge [[John E. Jones III]], with an emphasis on what the case meant for the citizens of Dover.<ref>[http://www.au.org/site/News2?abbr=cs_&page=NewsArticle&id=9859|The Devil in Dover]</ref>
The book explores the behind-the-scenes events that led to the filing of a lawsuit by Tammy Kitzmiller and ten other parents in Dover, Pennsylvania in 2005 and covers the events of the trial up to and after the verdict for the plaintiffs by Judge [[John E. Jones III]], with an emphasis on what the case meant for the citizens of Dover.<ref>[http://www.au.org/site/News2?abbr=cs_&page=NewsArticle&id=9859|The Devil in Dover]</ref>


It deals with the involvement of outside parties like the [[Discovery Institute]], [[Thomas Moore Law Center]], [[ACLU]], the scientific, religious and philosophical issues raised by the intelligent design movement, and the pitfalls for journalists covering a controversy like "Kitzmiller", particularly small-town reporters.<ref>[http://www.thenewpress.com/index.php?option=com_title&task=view_title&metaproductid=1693|The Devil in Dover by Lauri Lebo]</ref>
It deals with the involvement of outside parties like the [[Discovery Institute]], [[Thomas More Law Center]], [[ACLU]], the scientific, religious and philosophical issues raised by the intelligent design movement, and the pitfalls for journalists covering a controversy like "Kitzmiller", particularly small-town reporters.<ref>[http://www.thenewpress.com/index.php?option=com_title&task=view_title&metaproductid=1693|The Devil in Dover by Lauri Lebo]</ref>


It details Lebo's personal experience of the trial, including her interactions with her fundamentalist father, who favored the defendants.
It details Lebo's personal experience of the trial, including her interactions with her fundamentalist father, who favored the defendants.
Line 27: Line 27:
*[[Lauri Lebo]]
*[[Lauri Lebo]]
*[[York Daily Record]]
*[[York Daily Record]]

*[[Mike Argento]]


==Further reading==
==Further reading==
* [[Edward Humes]], 2007. ''[[Monkey Girl]''. Jonathan Cape. Monkey Girl: Evolution, Education, Religion, and the Battle for America's Soul. The first book account of the [i][[[Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District]][/i] trial
* [[Edward Humes]], 2007. ''[[Monkey_girl|Monkey Girl]]''. Jonathan Cape. Monkey Girl: Evolution, Education, Religion, and the Battle for America's Soul. The first book account of the ''[[Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District]]'' trial


* [[Matthew Chapman]], 1999. ''[[40_Days_and_40_Nights_(2007_Book)|40 Days & 40 Nights|]]''. Harper Collins. A great-great-grandson of Darwin reflects on the "Dover monkey trial".
* [[Matthew Chapman]], 2007. ''[[40_Days_and_40_Nights_(2007_Book)|40 Days & 40 Nights]]''. Harper Collins. A great-great-grandson of Darwin reflects on the "Dover monkey trial".





Revision as of 03:04, 2 February 2009

The Devil in Dover
AuthorLauri Lebo
SubjectIntelligent design, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
PublisherThe New Press
Publication date
2008
Pages256
ISBNISBN 978-1-59558-208-9 Parameter error in {{ISBNT}}: invalid character

The Devil in Dover: An Insider's Story of Dogma v. Darwin in Small-Town America is a book by journalist Lauri Lebo about the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District intelligent design trial, through her own perspective as a local reporter on the trial as she confronted her own attitudes about organized religion and her father who was a fundamentalist Christian.

Themes

The book explores the behind-the-scenes events that led to the filing of a lawsuit by Tammy Kitzmiller and ten other parents in Dover, Pennsylvania in 2005 and covers the events of the trial up to and after the verdict for the plaintiffs by Judge John E. Jones III, with an emphasis on what the case meant for the citizens of Dover.[1]

It deals with the involvement of outside parties like the Discovery Institute, Thomas More Law Center, ACLU, the scientific, religious and philosophical issues raised by the intelligent design movement, and the pitfalls for journalists covering a controversy like "Kitzmiller", particularly small-town reporters.[2]

It details Lebo's personal experience of the trial, including her interactions with her fundamentalist father, who favored the defendants.


References

See also


Further reading