Jump to content

User talk:VoteSchiff: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Request for unblock accepted
mNo edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:


::::'''VoteSchiff Reply:''' I agree with your statement and yes, I understand that I must not use reverts in cases of content disputes. This would also apply to Ajacreative, since they were actually reverting the content, to get rid of my contribution. They should have sought consensus instead. I hope that they will understand this as well and not take the first opportunity at another revert.
::::'''VoteSchiff Reply:''' I agree with your statement and yes, I understand that I must not use reverts in cases of content disputes. This would also apply to Ajacreative, since they were actually reverting the content, to get rid of my contribution. They should have sought consensus instead. I hope that they will understand this as well and not take the first opportunity at another revert.

::::'''Thank you Aitias!''' [[User:VoteSchiff|VoteSchiff]] ([[User talk:VoteSchiff#top|talk]]) 05:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:03, 8 February 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for engaging in an edit war at Peter Schiff. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — Aitias // discussion 03:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

User:VoteSchiff promised not to edit war again. Also, they agreed to seek consensus instead of reverting (cf. discussion).

Request handled by:Aitias // discussion 05:00, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you promise not to do any reverts on that article again (i.e. to stop edit warring) until there's a clear consensus I'd feel comfortable unblocking. — Aitias // discussion 04:24, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
VoteSchiff Reply: Do you consider my original contribution valid? All I want is that the contribution stand, as is. But, yes, of course I will promise not participate in edit warring (ultimately undoing someone else's edit war against me). -- VoteSchiff (talk) 04:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The point is not whether your original contribution is considered to be valid. The point is that you have to seek consensus for your changes if they are disputed. Do you understand that you must not use reverts to win a content dispute? — Aitias // discussion 04:49, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
VoteSchiff Reply: I agree with your statement and yes, I understand that I must not use reverts in cases of content disputes. This would also apply to Ajacreative, since they were actually reverting the content, to get rid of my contribution. They should have sought consensus instead. I hope that they will understand this as well and not take the first opportunity at another revert.
Thank you Aitias! VoteSchiff (talk) 05:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]