Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al G. Pedroche: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Keep''' per Baileypalblue - [[User:AdamBMorgan|AdamBMorgan]] ([[User talk:AdamBMorgan|talk]]) 12:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' per Baileypalblue - [[User:AdamBMorgan|AdamBMorgan]] ([[User talk:AdamBMorgan|talk]]) 12:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' per nom. I have to wonder (and I'm not being sarcastic) why someone who's notable has to create an article about himself instead of letting others do it. Also, Google only turns up 45 hits, and Googlenews 0.--[[User:CyberGhostface|CyberGhostface]] ([[User talk:CyberGhostface|talk]]) 13:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per nom. I have to wonder (and I'm not being sarcastic) why someone who's notable has to create an article about himself instead of letting others do it. Also, Google only turns up 45 hits, and Googlenews 0.--[[User:CyberGhostface|CyberGhostface]] ([[User talk:CyberGhostface|talk]]) 13:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Weak keep'''. Despite failing [[WP:CREATIVE]], he has recieved significant coverage from (I'm hesitant to say reliable) sources independent of the subject. [[User:ZappyGun|ZappyGun ]]<font color="blue">[[User_talk:ZappyGun|(talk to me)]]</font><font color="green">[[Special:Contributions/ZappyGun|What I've done for Wikipedia]]</font> 14:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:39, 24 February 2009
Al G. Pedroche
- Al G. Pedroche (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
WP:AUTOBIO, WP:PEACOCK, reads like an election campaign handout, notability unclear, unreferenced, orphan MuffledThud (talk) 06:38, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —Bluemask (talk) 10:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable Filipino press figure. I have added reliable sources to satisfy the general notability guideline. The article needs a lot of editing, but that's not a reason for deletion. Baileypalblue (talk) 10:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per Baileypalblue - AdamBMorgan (talk) 12:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I have to wonder (and I'm not being sarcastic) why someone who's notable has to create an article about himself instead of letting others do it. Also, Google only turns up 45 hits, and Googlenews 0.--CyberGhostface (talk) 13:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Despite failing WP:CREATIVE, he has recieved significant coverage from (I'm hesitant to say reliable) sources independent of the subject. ZappyGun (talk to me)What I've done for Wikipedia 14:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)