Talk:Rashash

Claims of Priority

To claim priority, one needs to substantiate that one or the other of these rabbis is the "preferred" or the only "normal" referent of "Rashash." Repeated reversions to unsourced prioritization are unexceptable unacceptable. Editors must put aside personal feelings of awe for one or another rabbi and maintain a Neutral Point of View, remembering that this is an encyclopedia, not a hagiography. חנינא (talk) 17:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

69.86.76.? messed up the discussion. Now User:Hanina is making a mess out of his own personal feelings and/or argumentation. Strangely enough, I concur with his analysis that the prioritization cannot be objected or left out (i.e. cannot be excepted, indeed "unexceptable"). 82.253.163.98 (talk) 02:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Play nice please

I think an Ashkenaz yeshiva bochur, when asked who the Rashash was, would answer that he lived in Vilna. I think Hanina's version is supported by disambiguation page guidelines, and if this silly edit war continues I will have little choice but to protect the page. JFW | T@lk 22:09, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Why in the world would an Ashkenazi yeshivah bakhur serve as the truth meter to settle this question? Play honest please! This is not a silly edit war. This is simply a way of condescendingly treating the opinion of all self-respecting Sefaradim. You may think Hanina and/or 69.86.76.?'s version is supported by disambiguation page guidelines, I actually believe (together with a few other contributors I guess) that this isn't a neutral point of view. A vote may be here required. Patronizing cannot settle a question. 82.253.242.160 (talk) 02:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)