Talk:Fluctuation theorem: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I tagged this page "too technical" because, even though I don't have a physics degree, it should still be able to inform me as to why [[Loschmidt's paradox]] (which I could understand) isn't a problem. ~~ '''[[User:Nickptar|N]]''' ([[User talk:Nickptar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Nickptar|c]]) 04:21, 6 November 2005 (UTC) |
I tagged this page "too technical" because, even though I don't have a physics degree, it should still be able to inform me as to why [[Loschmidt's paradox]] (which I could understand) isn't a problem. ~~ '''[[User:Nickptar|N]]''' ([[User talk:Nickptar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Nickptar|c]]) 04:21, 6 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
I hardly understand anything either how is entropy defined in this article? What does an average over entropy production mean, since entropy is already defined by summing over the whole distribution of states. It seems that this article somehow associates an entropy to every microstate, or something like that.[[User:ThorinMuglindir|ThorinMuglindir]] 19:54, 6 November 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:54, 6 November 2005
I tagged this page "too technical" because, even though I don't have a physics degree, it should still be able to inform me as to why Loschmidt's paradox (which I could understand) isn't a problem. ~~ N (t/c) 04:21, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
I hardly understand anything either how is entropy defined in this article? What does an average over entropy production mean, since entropy is already defined by summing over the whole distribution of states. It seems that this article somehow associates an entropy to every microstate, or something like that.ThorinMuglindir 19:54, 6 November 2005 (UTC)