Jump to content

Tax residence: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Added tax residency for companies in the UK
Line 10: Line 10:


== Tax residence by country for individuals ==
== Tax residence by country for individuals ==

Different countries set different standards to determine tax residence, but broadly, an individual becomes resident in a country if they are in that country for more than a certain number of days. The following list specifies the number of days (or months) in a variety of countries:
Different countries set different standards to determine tax residence, but broadly, an individual becomes resident in a country if they are in that country for more than a certain number of days per year. The following list specifies the number of days (or months) in a variety of countries:
* France: 180 days
* France: 180 days
* Germany: 6 months
* Germany: 6 months
Line 16: Line 17:
* United Kingdom: 91 days
* United Kingdom: 91 days
* United States: 122 days
* United States: 122 days

==Tax residence in the United Kingdom for companies==

A company is generally treated as resident in the United Kingdom for tax purposes if it is incorporated in the United Kingdom or, if not incorporated in the United Kingdom, if its central management and control is exercised in the United Kingdom. "Central management and control" refers to the highest level of oversight, usually as exercised by the board, rather than day-to-day management.{{Fact|date=March 2009}}

An individual or company resident in the United Kingdom is liable to tax on their worldwide income and gains.


==Tax residence in Germany==
==Tax residence in Germany==

Revision as of 10:56, 13 March 2009

Legal residence is the principle that each legal person (natural or corporate) has a single location of primary residence. This is of relevance with respect to taxation and other state-imposed obligations, but is also important with respect to the determination of citizenship or nationality.

Usually legal residence and tax residence are defined differently in law in that one can be an illegal alien and resident for tax purposes in the same country. Also, it is possible to be resident, for tax purposes, in more than one country at a time.

Domicile is, in many countries, a different legal concept to residence.

In the face of growth in the scope of governmental regulation, and an increasing burden of taxation, corporations and individuals not surprisingly have sought to avoid, or at least to minimise, the effects of state intervention.[1] This was particularly important with respect to taxation,[2] both from the perspective of governments – which would lose revenue – and that of corporations or individuals who sought to avoid payment of taxes.

Tax residence by country for individuals

Different countries set different standards to determine tax residence, but broadly, an individual becomes resident in a country if they are in that country for more than a certain number of days per year. The following list specifies the number of days (or months) in a variety of countries:

  • France: 180 days
  • Germany: 6 months
  • South Africa: 91 days
  • United Kingdom: 91 days
  • United States: 122 days

Tax residence in the United Kingdom for companies

A company is generally treated as resident in the United Kingdom for tax purposes if it is incorporated in the United Kingdom or, if not incorporated in the United Kingdom, if its central management and control is exercised in the United Kingdom. "Central management and control" refers to the highest level of oversight, usually as exercised by the board, rather than day-to-day management.[citation needed]

An individual or company resident in the United Kingdom is liable to tax on their worldwide income and gains.

Tax residence in Germany

All tax resident individuals are taxed on their worldwide income, regardless of the source. This would include salary, dividends etc that you earn from your limited company. Generally, individuals are deemed to be tax resident if they are physically present in Germany for more than six months in any one calendar year or for a consecutive period of six months over a calendar year-end. This ruling is applied retrospectively so presence in Germany from, say, 1 March to 30 November would make you German tax resident and therefore subject to German tax on your worldwide income for the entire period rather than just from the beginning of the seventh month.[citation needed]

An individual can also be deemed tax resident if they acquire an abode in Germany. This can include renting, as opposed to purchasing, a property but only if the duration of the lease is deemed to be more than temporary. For this reason, to avoid German tax residency, short-term (e.g., three months) should be taken out wherever possible.[citation needed]

Non-resident individuals are taxed on German-source income only. In the case of salary and benefits from your limited company, the source is German since the duties of the employment are being performed in Germany. However, dividends from your limited company (assuming this is not deemed to have a permanent establishment in Germany – see below) would be from a non-German source regardless of where the dividends are received. There is therefore scope for tax mitigation here in the event you do not become a German tax resident (although non-German taxes may also need to be considered).[citation needed]

Tax haven

One option that became available in this respect was the tax haven – a country that attracted overseas companies and individuals to register or otherwise obtain legal residence, in return for paying minimal tax. As states alone levied taxation, so states alone could offer taxation incentives to investors. There was a significant rise in the number of tax havens in the course of the 20th century. This has continued into the 21st century,[3] even though tax burdens have in many cases eased. Possibly half of all money in circulation throughout the world either resides in or passes through tax havens.[4] In very few of these cases do the investors actually physically reside in the tax havens. It is generally sufficient if their legal residence is within the haven. If companies or individuals were required to relocate completely from one jurisdiction to another to take advantage of a tax haven, interest in tax havens would perhaps have remained relatively insignificant. Use of a tax haven usually requires only a legal move, the management of most companies – and private investors – remaining physically located elsewhere.[5]

See also

Notes and references

  1. ^ Financial Stability Forum, Report of the Working Group on Offshore Centers, Financial Stability Forum, Basel, 2000. p 11; available at <http://www.fsforum.org/Reports/RepOFC.pdf> (as at 17 July 2002).
  2. ^ J Prebble, "Criminal Law, Tax Evasion, Shams, and Tax Avoidance: Part 1 – Tax Evasion and General Doctrines of Criminal Law" (1996) 2 NZJTLP 3; J Prebble, "Criminal Law, Tax Evasion, Shams, and Tax Avoidance: Part II – Criminal Law Consequences of Categories of Evasion and Avoidance" (1996) 2 NZJTLP 59; R McIntosh and J Veal, "Tax Evasion and New Zealanders’ Attitudes Towards It" (2001) 7 NZJTLP 80.
  3. ^ R Palan, "Tax Havens and the Commercialization of State Sovereignty" (2002) 56 Int Organization 151.
  4. ^ M Cassard, The Role of Offshore Centers in International Financial Intermediation, Washington, IMF, 1994, IMF Working Paper WP/94/107; N Kochen, "Cleaning up by Cleaning up" (April 1991) Euromoney 73.
  5. ^ R Palan, "Tax Havens and the Commercialization of State Sovereignty" (2002) 56 Int Organization 151, 163; W Diamond and D Diamond, Tax Havens of the World, New York, Matthew Bender Books, 1998.