User talk:Hmwith/IP: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Disarea - "→Article deletion: new section" |
→re 3rd party: new section |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I'm not sure why my article on 5pm web software was deleted. The documentation states that "This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people and organizations themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software and so on." 5pm is a software that has been in business for a longer period than other software mentioned in PM section of Wikipedia and has been reviewed positively by many websites. The article was short but I was going to expand it and also hoping people would help. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Disarea|Disarea]] ([[User talk:Disarea|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Disarea|contribs]]) 22:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
I'm not sure why my article on 5pm web software was deleted. The documentation states that "This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people and organizations themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software and so on." 5pm is a software that has been in business for a longer period than other software mentioned in PM section of Wikipedia and has been reviewed positively by many websites. The article was short but I was going to expand it and also hoping people would help. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Disarea|Disarea]] ([[User talk:Disarea|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Disarea|contribs]]) 22:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== re 3rd party == |
|||
hi there hmwith ~ |
|||
i was wondering about the process of getting a 3rd party to look at the discussion, as you know. my question is, what if the person who actually takes it to the Admin team does not have the time to really stick around and participate? is it more of a handing it over, and there is no need for the editors to really be a part of the process? if so, i will probably ask for a bit more advice and then will go ahead and do it myself. thanks a bunch! [[User:Sko1221|<font color="darkorange">'''Sarah'''</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Sko1221|<font color="forestgreen">'''sko1221''']]</font><sup>[[User talk:Sko1221|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 17:29, 13 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:29, 13 March 2009
File:Canihavearideoctave.ogg
Please see File:Canihavearideoctave.ogg, thank you.--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 19:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Article deletion
I'm not sure why my article on 5pm web software was deleted. The documentation states that "This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people and organizations themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software and so on." 5pm is a software that has been in business for a longer period than other software mentioned in PM section of Wikipedia and has been reviewed positively by many websites. The article was short but I was going to expand it and also hoping people would help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Disarea (talk • contribs) 22:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
re 3rd party
hi there hmwith ~ i was wondering about the process of getting a 3rd party to look at the discussion, as you know. my question is, what if the person who actually takes it to the Admin team does not have the time to really stick around and participate? is it more of a handing it over, and there is no need for the editors to really be a part of the process? if so, i will probably ask for a bit more advice and then will go ahead and do it myself. thanks a bunch! Sarah sko1221talk 17:29, 13 March 2009 (UTC)