Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Scheurwater: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 6: Line 6:


:'''Weak keep'''. That's a borderline case. If the information on the article is accurate, he actually received two awards and 10 nominations for his work, so I think he may pass [[WP:N]]. On the other hand, there's a [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest]] since he wrote his own article, so we definitely need to check the validity of the awards / nominations. [[User:Laurent1979|Laurent]] ([[User talk:Laurent1979|talk]]) 15:41, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
:'''Weak keep'''. That's a borderline case. If the information on the article is accurate, he actually received two awards and 10 nominations for his work, so I think he may pass [[WP:N]]. On the other hand, there's a [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest]] since he wrote his own article, so we definitely need to check the validity of the awards / nominations. [[User:Laurent1979|Laurent]] ([[User talk:Laurent1979|talk]]) 15:41, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Websites|list of Websites-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—[[Special:Contributions/87.252.35.195|87.252.35.195]] ([[User talk:87.252.35.195|talk]]) 15:47, 14 March 2009 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 15:47, 14 March 2009

Robert Scheurwater (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Autobiography about a web designer whose only claim to notability seems to be the recipient of (what appears to me to be) a small website design award. Fails WP:BIO. --AbsolutDan (talk) 14:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. That's a borderline case. If the information on the article is accurate, he actually received two awards and 10 nominations for his work, so I think he may pass WP:N. On the other hand, there's a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest since he wrote his own article, so we definitely need to check the validity of the awards / nominations. Laurent (talk) 15:41, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]