Jump to content

Talk:Autism Diagnostic Interview: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Sscline (talk | contribs)
Created page with 'Peer review: -This is a very informative and organized article. Though it does not give many details, the article's information is straightforward and helpful in u…'
 
Sscline (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Peer review:
Peer review:
-This is a very informative and organized article. Though it does not give many details, the article's information is straightforward and helpful in understanding the subject matter. Also, the article is sourced very well, using scholarly articles and empirical data. The author also provides external links to psychology resources to those who want more information. The only change I think the article needs is a little more elaboration on some of the areas covered. With a little expansion though, this will be an excellent article in my mind.
-This is a very informative and organized article. Though it does not give many details, the article's information is straightforward and helpful in understanding the subject matter. Its lede is effective: short, simple, and to-the-point. The article is sourced very well, using scholarly articles and empirical data and also includes external links to psychology resources for those who want more information. The only change I think the article needs is a little more elaboration on some of the areas covered. It would be interesting to see some information about how the ADI-R was developed/why it's structured the way it is, when/where it was developed, who played a role in developing it, etc.With a little expansion though, this will be an excellent article in my mind.
[[User:Sscline|Sscline]] ([[User talk:Sscline|talk]]) 19:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Sscline
[[User:Sscline|Sscline]] ([[User talk:Sscline|talk]]) 19:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Sscline

Revision as of 19:35, 22 March 2009

Peer review: -This is a very informative and organized article. Though it does not give many details, the article's information is straightforward and helpful in understanding the subject matter. Its lede is effective: short, simple, and to-the-point. The article is sourced very well, using scholarly articles and empirical data and also includes external links to psychology resources for those who want more information. The only change I think the article needs is a little more elaboration on some of the areas covered. It would be interesting to see some information about how the ADI-R was developed/why it's structured the way it is, when/where it was developed, who played a role in developing it, etc.With a little expansion though, this will be an excellent article in my mind. Sscline (talk) 19:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Sscline[reply]