User talk:Roux: Difference between revisions
→Akron Reflinks: new section |
→Akron Reflinks: arguably of interest to you? |
||
Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
{{tb|Talk:Akron, Ohio|tp=1}} |
{{tb|Talk:Akron, Ohio|tp=1}} |
||
[[User:Stepshep|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#333333;">§hep</span>]][[User talk:Stepshep|<span style="font-family:Helvetica;color:#333333;"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]] 20:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC) |
[[User:Stepshep|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#333333;">§hep</span>]][[User talk:Stepshep|<span style="font-family:Helvetica;color:#333333;"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]] 20:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
==Arguably of interest to you?== |
|||
You may be interested in scanning [[User talk:Tznkai#Missed the point]]? |
|||
In this context, you may be unexpectedly gratified by [[User:Caspian blue|Caspian blue]]'s arguably constructive contributions at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration]] where the complaint was captioned [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&diff=prev&oldid=280511380 "Verifiability/Use English/Burdens in proxy battlefield article"]. [''Note: This was the last diff before the request thread was blanked as part of the process of accepting a case. To scan the discussion thread, you simply scroll down the page to find the full text. If you click on "next edit" at the top of the page, you can confirm for yourself what happens next.'']. --[[User:Tenmei|Tenmei]] ([[User talk:Tenmei|talk]]) 20:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:55, 30 March 2009
talk:roux // a tale full of sound and fury, signifying nothing
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SorryBut I don't want to ruin Wikipedia and I am worried that I might but is the page okay.--AKM73 (talk) 18:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Personal attacksNo. No it does not matter whether he said it first. And Wikipedia is not fair. You are required to be civil. Is that clear? Do not just blindly revert this with some statement in the edit summary, engage in actual conversation to show me why I should not ask an admin to block you to prevent further attacks. //roux 00:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
TalkbackHello, Roux. You have new messages at Bradp521's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. someone else needs the whois speechUser talk:98.194.197.134 is doing the same thing as the other IP did, would you mind telling him about it? Momusufan (talk) 18:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC) AfDWe do not customarily use symbols with !votes at Afd.DGG (talk) 02:20, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Akron ReflinksHello, Roux. You have new messages at Talk:Akron, Ohio.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. §hepTalk 20:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC) Arguably of interest to you?You may be interested in scanning User talk:Tznkai#Missed the point? In this context, you may be unexpectedly gratified by Caspian blue's arguably constructive contributions at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration where the complaint was captioned "Verifiability/Use English/Burdens in proxy battlefield article". [Note: This was the last diff before the request thread was blanked as part of the process of accepting a case. To scan the discussion thread, you simply scroll down the page to find the full text. If you click on "next edit" at the top of the page, you can confirm for yourself what happens next.]. --Tenmei (talk) 20:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC) |