Jump to content

User talk:Roux: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Akron Reflinks: new section
Akron Reflinks: arguably of interest to you?
Line 93: Line 93:
{{tb|Talk:Akron, Ohio|tp=1}}
{{tb|Talk:Akron, Ohio|tp=1}}
[[User:Stepshep|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#333333;">§hep</span>]][[User talk:Stepshep|<span style="font-family:Helvetica;color:#333333;"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]] 20:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
[[User:Stepshep|<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#333333;">§hep</span>]][[User talk:Stepshep|<span style="font-family:Helvetica;color:#333333;"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]] 20:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

==Arguably of interest to you?==
You may be interested in scanning [[User talk:Tznkai#Missed the point]]?

In this context, you may be unexpectedly gratified by [[User:Caspian blue|Caspian blue]]'s arguably constructive contributions at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration]] where the complaint was captioned [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&diff=prev&oldid=280511380 "Verifiability/Use English/Burdens in proxy battlefield article"]. [''Note: This was the last diff before the request thread was blanked as part of the process of accepting a case. To scan the discussion thread, you simply scroll down the page to find the full text. If you click on "next edit" at the top of the page, you can confirm for yourself what happens next.'']. --[[User:Tenmei|Tenmei]] ([[User talk:Tenmei|talk]]) 20:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:55, 30 March 2009

talk:roux // a tale full of sound and fury, signifying nothing

Archives
2008 / apr-aug / a / s / o / n / d
2009 / j / f / m / a / m / j / j / a / s / o / n / d

Sorry

But I don't want to ruin Wikipedia and I am worried that I might but is the page okay.--AKM73 (talk) 18:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Dude, why was my article deleted? --8675EO9 (talk) 00:09, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

No. No it does not matter whether he said it first. And Wikipedia is not fair. You are required to be civil. Is that clear? Do not just blindly revert this with some statement in the edit summary, engage in actual conversation to show me why I should not ask an admin to block you to prevent further attacks. //roux   00:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Isnt he also required to be civil and not personally attack me as he did? Also thank you for giving me the tip on how to do that reference thing easier, and if I seemed to disrespect you that was not my attentio-(offering hand out to shake). Because i am just going to ignore Stephshep's attempts to lure me into getting blocked.--Threeblur0 (talk) 00:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC) --Threeblur0 (talk) 00:58, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Roux. You have new messages at Bradp521's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

someone else needs the whois speech

User talk:98.194.197.134 is doing the same thing as the other IP did, would you mind telling him about it? Momusufan (talk) 18:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

We do not customarily use symbols with !votes at Afd.DGG (talk) 02:20, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bleh. I'm using a script from WP:US to make voting simpler. It appears to add them. I'm well aware of how AFD works though, thanks. //roux   02:21, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Roux. You have new messages at Talk:Akron, Ohio.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

§hepTalk 20:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arguably of interest to you?

You may be interested in scanning User talk:Tznkai#Missed the point?

In this context, you may be unexpectedly gratified by Caspian blue's arguably constructive contributions at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration where the complaint was captioned "Verifiability/Use English/Burdens in proxy battlefield article". [Note: This was the last diff before the request thread was blanked as part of the process of accepting a case. To scan the discussion thread, you simply scroll down the page to find the full text. If you click on "next edit" at the top of the page, you can confirm for yourself what happens next.]. --Tenmei (talk) 20:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]