User talk:Rettetast: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 67: Line 67:
Hi. I noticed that you are tagging a lot of football players. Please consider additionally adding "|living=yes" in WPBiography if they are active/alive. This would be helpful. Thanks, [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 00:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed that you are tagging a lot of football players. Please consider additionally adding "|living=yes" in WPBiography if they are active/alive. This would be helpful. Thanks, [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 00:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
:Also be careful about which players you tag with the football project tag. At least one of them, [[Adam McPhee]] plays [[Australian rules football]], not [[Association football]]. How did he turn up on your list? [[User:The-Pope|The-Pope]] ([[User talk:The-Pope|talk]]) 15:58, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
:Also be careful about which players you tag with the football project tag. At least one of them, [[Adam McPhee]] plays [[Australian rules football]], not [[Association football]]. How did he turn up on your list? [[User:The-Pope|The-Pope]] ([[User talk:The-Pope|talk]]) 15:58, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

== Temporary injunction and your use of my monobook script ==

Hi Rettetast,


I was advised to put a post directly on your talk page so you know that ArbCom has announced a temporary injunction against the "mass delinking of dates". You can still delink dates on an occasional basis; however, you may wish to be cautious and use the script only for its non-date functions until the issue is resolved by an RFC poll. You may wish to express your view on autoformatting and date linking in the RFC at: [[Wikipedia:Date_formatting_and_linking_poll]].

Regards [[User:Lightmouse|Lightmouse]] ([[User talk:Lightmouse|talk]]) 17:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:39, 6 April 2009


Press here to leave me a message
Sign your messages by typing ~~~~
I usually respond here

Restore article about the company ShipNet

Hi

As the IT-Manager of the Company I request the article to be restored immeidately. The Article is a presentation of the company and what we do and is far from a commercial for any of the products we delvier

The article is picked up from our "about" page on our homepage that gives a clear indication on what the company do and other information about the company

If anything is unclear, please do not hesitate to contact me on my personal e-mail at: trond-richard.larsen@shipnet.no


Best Regards, Trond-Ricahrd

(Trlarsen (talk) 19:08, 15 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Trond-Richard. Please see WP:COI. You should not write articles about yourself. The article was not very encyclopedic. If you are notable enough someone else will write an entry about you. You should use your own webpage and not wikipedia to distribute information about your company. You could try to write an article from scratch on a subpage of your userpage or at your talkpage, and consult me for advice. If it gets ready to the level that it can be used on wikipedia I will assists in moving it to the article-space. Rettetast (talk) 19:13, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hagar Qim

Hello there, you've proposed deletion for an aerial image of the Hagar Qim temple complex. Is there really no case to keep it? Such images will be impossible to reproduce once the protective shields are up (late this year, work has already begun on them) and as an image it is perfectly suited to the article. ja fiswa imċappas bil-hara! (talk) 12:23, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Per now the image is replaceable and fails WP:NFCC. A free image should be created while we have the opportunity. If we allow this image such an image will certainly not be created. Rettetast (talk) 14:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Would you mind explaining how I should go about doing that? ja fiswa imċappas bil-hara! (talk) 14:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea. What do you think? Rettetast (talk) 11:30, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is the deal with all this fair use rationale crap I keep getting?

Really? These are advertising images, they are in the public domain, they are bing used for non-profit reasons. I am not going to write a five paragraph essay on how they are public images. If you'd like to do something constructive like building up the rationale instead of tagging everybody's images for deletion then do it. But what you guys are doing does no good for the site it only detracts because you mark all these images but do nothing to help keep them alived. I'm sick and tired of all the bureaucratic crap.--Robert Waalk (talk) 00:14, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FURG. Rettetast (talk) 08:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Extraordinarily productive and helpful. I'm simply blown away with awe as I udnerstand every thing and all my images are brought to par. Yeah. I want to know what's the deal with the idiotic policies? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert Waalk (talkcontribs)
What did you expect with the tone you are talking to other people with. Rettetast (talk) 15:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
At this point you would be too if you had to constantly put up with this crap.--Robert Waalk (talk) 21:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article Morose Forest deletion

Hello,

I do not understand and am unsure why have you nominated my article, Morose Forest, for deletion. I'd like a simple explanation.

Thank you for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Niaurus (talkcontribs) 10:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hei. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morose Forest. Rettetast (talk) 10:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Sweden tagging

Hello, if you're tagging articles for WPSweden with Stub-class as default, it would be practical if you also include a placeholder for importance, i.e. {{WikiProject Sweden|class=Stub|importance=}}. Regards, Tomas e (talk) 13:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. Will do. Rettetast (talk) 13:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Tomas e (talk) 13:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Football players tagging

Hi. I noticed that you are tagging a lot of football players. Please consider additionally adding "|living=yes" in WPBiography if they are active/alive. This would be helpful. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 00:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also be careful about which players you tag with the football project tag. At least one of them, Adam McPhee plays Australian rules football, not Association football. How did he turn up on your list? The-Pope (talk) 15:58, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary injunction and your use of my monobook script

Hi Rettetast,


I was advised to put a post directly on your talk page so you know that ArbCom has announced a temporary injunction against the "mass delinking of dates". You can still delink dates on an occasional basis; however, you may wish to be cautious and use the script only for its non-date functions until the issue is resolved by an RFC poll. You may wish to express your view on autoformatting and date linking in the RFC at: Wikipedia:Date_formatting_and_linking_poll.

Regards Lightmouse (talk) 17:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]