User talk:Nymf

For archived discussions, click here. Please do not edit the archives, but start a new discussion instead.

All I have to say is...

if you earned that.... then you must be one hell of an excellent editor :-D Hilarious! If he keeps it up I will try to have an anchor hung onto the account and his IP too. As always... keep up the good work! The Real Libs-speak politely 12:43, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Good catch on the picture pirate

Sneaky. Good that you caught the sock similarities as well. I thought I would let you know about this list See link It is an oft referred to page where users can add new genre troll that they cross paths with and admins check it every now and then to see which accounts/IPs are still active and revert them. I just added Albert Mond to the list. Feel free to add anyone you come across who fits the bill. Just note that Wiki libs invited you to use the list in your first edit summary. The Real Libs-speak politely 11:11, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Libsy. :-) Sadly bureaucratics deemed the evidence as "inconclusive", which is just ridicilous really. I'll keep that link in mind. Cheers. Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 22:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

A subject of concern

Hi, sorry to trouble you, but there's been some matters pertaining to certain subjects on wikipedia which I am suspicious about and would rather not express them in public. Would it be possible to correspond in some other way over this? Thanks. 193.252.36.78 (talk) 09:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Forgot to log in. Dark Prime (talk) 09:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Depending on the subject matter, we might be able to talk off the site. Can you give me a hint as to what this is about? Thanks. Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 23:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Photos (licenses etc.) related to some bands. Dark Prime (talk) 09:25, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Liar

I reference all of my edits, if I have information without a reference then I post it in discussion and leave it to someone to post. Maybe you should stay away from pages about things that you are very biased about. I assume you are referring to my edit on Varg Vikernes' page where I posted a quote from "Lords of Chaos" about Vikernes' superficial Nazi-based ideology. It was referenced plain and clear. Just because you sympathize with this person does not mean you have the right to not only omit correct information, but also attack me for being "libelous". Your type is the kind that has turned Wikipedia into a useless resource that is literally forbidden from being referenced in academia unless it is to point out just how much misinformation is around on this website. Leave me alone and stop lying about me. If you have a problem with my edits, make a note of it in the discussion section for that page as well as clear evidence that the book you claim is "controversial" is actually so. Just because Vikernes, a convicted murderer and a pathological liar says that the book is wrong does not mean it is wrong. In fact, that would be biased information. Get off of my talk page with your unfounded accusations, you and your friend. Fermentor (talk) 06:55, 10 April 2009 (UTC)