Jump to content

Talk:Soldier's Creed: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Barkmoss (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Barkmoss (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
Actually, I would disagree with that because as a recent graduate of AIT. We, had various persons from different Basic Training locations that converged for our daily reiteration of the creed. I will say that at my Basic Training company, the instructors would tell us theres "No Hooah" . Though with the influx of soldiers from Fort Benning they were encouraged to say Hooah, as even the majority of the instructors at my AIT told us there is no "Hooah" in The Soldiers Creed, though the defiant soldiers would usually do so out of respect for the way THEIR Drill Sergeants had taught them. I think this also happened with soldiers from Fort Knox. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/69.250.233.179|69.250.233.179]] ([[User talk:69.250.233.179|talk]]) 23:55, 2 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Actually, I would disagree with that because as a recent graduate of AIT. We, had various persons from different Basic Training locations that converged for our daily reiteration of the creed. I will say that at my Basic Training company, the instructors would tell us theres "No Hooah" . Though with the influx of soldiers from Fort Benning they were encouraged to say Hooah, as even the majority of the instructors at my AIT told us there is no "Hooah" in The Soldiers Creed, though the defiant soldiers would usually do so out of respect for the way THEIR Drill Sergeants had taught them. I think this also happened with soldiers from Fort Knox. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/69.250.233.179|69.250.233.179]] ([[User talk:69.250.233.179|talk]]) 23:55, 2 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== This Is Not The Same Creed The Army Has Used For Most Of The Twentieth Century ==
Apparently, this creed has undergone revisions in the fairly recent past. However, the past wordings of The Creed appear difficult to find. As there are soldiers still alive from those times, quoting the older versions of The Creed shouldn't be difficult and it would be useful for us to see how our country has chosen to change The Creed over time. [[User:Barkmoss|Barkmoss]] ([[User talk:Barkmoss|talk]]) 19:32, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Apparently, this creed has undergone revisions in the fairly recent past. However, the past wordings of The Creed appear difficult to find. As there are soldiers still alive from those times, quoting the older versions of The Creed shouldn't be difficult and it would be useful for us to see how our country has chosen to change The Creed over time. [[User:Barkmoss|Barkmoss]] ([[User talk:Barkmoss|talk]]) 19:32, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:34, 18 April 2009

WikiProject iconMilitary history: North America / United States Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force

To summarize my changes:

  1. Redirected "Warrior Ethos" to "US Soldier's Creed"; merged the two articles to reduce confusion.
  2. Removed "entitled the 'Warrior Ethos'" - It is entitled the US Soldier's Creed. The "Warrior Ethos" is contained in the Creed.
  3. Removed the "dog-tag" reference - unnecessary; trite. It is now an external link.
  4. Moved "controversial" remark to end of paragraph, referenced cited article. Should this even be here?
  5. Formatted the second stanza (Warrior Ethos) in similar fashion to the way it is primarily displayed.
  6. Added merged "Warrior Ethos" copy.
  7. Added a reference to age of previous version.

I do not know what the Washington Post reference references.

I removed the quote saying "Soldier are no longer allowed to yell "Hooah!" it is inaccurate due to the fact that we are encouraged to do just that. 214.13.162.2 11:30, 24 July 2007 (UTC) Ski 20070724[reply]

The "Hooah conclusion".

Actually, I would disagree with that because as a recent graduate of AIT. We, had various persons from different Basic Training locations that converged for our daily reiteration of the creed. I will say that at my Basic Training company, the instructors would tell us theres "No Hooah" . Though with the influx of soldiers from Fort Benning they were encouraged to say Hooah, as even the majority of the instructors at my AIT told us there is no "Hooah" in The Soldiers Creed, though the defiant soldiers would usually do so out of respect for the way THEIR Drill Sergeants had taught them. I think this also happened with soldiers from Fort Knox. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.250.233.179 (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This Is Not The Same Creed The Army Has Used For Most Of The Twentieth Century

Apparently, this creed has undergone revisions in the fairly recent past. However, the past wordings of The Creed appear difficult to find. As there are soldiers still alive from those times, quoting the older versions of The Creed shouldn't be difficult and it would be useful for us to see how our country has chosen to change The Creed over time. Barkmoss (talk) 19:32, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]