User talk:Escalonab: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:23, 27 April 2009

Speedy deletion of Paul Kalkbrenner

A tag has been placed on Paul Kalkbrenner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 20:52, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I see where you're coming from on that. However, the problem is that nothing immediately demonstrates that the film itself is notable. It might be worth another shot, but you'd need to demonstrate it was actually a consequential experience by WP:FILM standards. I'm not going to just reinstate the article wholesale at the moment, but I will "userfy" it for you - putting a copy on a subpage of your user page for you to work on. Just a moment please. - Vianello (Talk) 00:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There we go. It's accessible at the moment at User:Escalonab/Kalkbrenner. If you want to move it to a different subpage name or something, that's more than fine. This'll give you a little chance to hash it out. Just remember to look carefully at WP:MUSIC and WP:FILM notability/inclusion criteria. If you can use reliable sources to demonstrate this person meets those, you're golden. - Vianello (Talk) 00:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok cool, I will work on the article until it meets the standards. Thank you! Escalonab (talk) 09:23, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 I see where you're coming from on that. However, the problem is that nothing immediately demonstrates that the film itself is notable. It might be worth another shot, but you'd need to demonstrate it was actually a consequential experience by WP:FILM standards. I'm not going to just reinstate the article wholesale at the moment, but I will "userfy" it for you - putting a copy on a subpage of your user page for you to work on. Just a moment please. - [[User:Vianello|Vianello]] ([[User talk:Vianello|Talk]]) 00:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 :There we go. It's accessible at the moment at [[User:Escalonab/Kalkbrenner]]. If you want to move it to a different subpage name or something, that's more than fine. This'll give you a little chance to hash it out. Just remember to look carefully at [[WP:MUSIC]] and [[WP:FILM]] notability/inclusion criteria. If you can use [[WP:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] to demonstrate this person meets those, you're golden. - [[User:Vianello|Vianello]] ([[User talk:Vianello|Talk]]) 00:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
+::Ok cool, I will work on the article until it meets the standards. Thank you! [[User:Escalonab|Escalonab]] ([[User talk:Escalonab#top|talk]]) 09:23, 27 April 2009 (UTC)