Jump to content

User talk:65.110.146.154: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Putting Individual Capitalism title in equal sign brackets in order for response to appear
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
[[User:Freddy the freeloader|Freddy the freeloader]] ([[User talk:Freddy the freeloader|talk]]) 08:11, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Freddy the freeloader. <ref life experience>
[[User:Freddy the freeloader|Freddy the freeloader]] ([[User talk:Freddy the freeloader|talk]]) 08:11, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Freddy the freeloader. <ref life experience>


==How Does this Statement on Individual Capitalism relate to me?==
How Does this Statement on Individual Capitalism relate to me?
I'm responding to Freddy the freeloader's comment on Individual Capitalism: How does your statement on Individual Capitalism relate to me? Overall I do concur that greed can be used wisely under a capitalist system and what many people see as a deadly sin, since greed is often identified as one of the seven deadly sins, I see as a great way to incentivize a system of people to produce, distribute, and/or consume goods and services in a robust economy. A system of natural liberty that automatically guides the economy through the invisible hand of the market place does far more to equitably and efficiently allocate goods and services in an economy versus the planned and command approach of a group of elite oligarchs that believe their wisdom surpasses that of a decentralized market place in how best to distribute goods and services in an economy.
I'm responding to Freddy the freeloader's comment on Individual Capitalism: How does your statement on Individual Capitalism relate to me? Overall I do concur that greed can be used wisely under a capitalist system and what many people see as a deadly sin, since greed is often identified as one of the seven deadly sins, I see as a great way to incentivize a system of people to produce, distribute, and/or consume goods and services in a robust economy. A system of natural liberty that automatically guides the economy through the invisible hand of the market place does far more to equitably and efficiently allocate goods and services in an economy versus the planned and command approach of a group of elite oligarchs that believe their wisdom surpasses that of a decentralized market place in how best to distribute goods and services in an economy.



Revision as of 21:16, 22 May 2009

Individual Capitalism

All systems of economic government have greed. Free individual capitalism puts greed in the right place. It rewards individual hard work while it rewards the collective peoples with goods and services. Goods and services that people want! Not what some greedy government person that may or may not be voted in wants you to have. If supply runs low, the needs are filled either by the 1st greedy person or another that makes the same thing better. Greed is in the right place it aspires progress because to get market share you either make it better make something new or make it more cost effective. Every one benefits. In a socialist type government you don't even own your own labor! If every thing is owned by the collective people (government), but controlled by the few selective people ... what kind of insanity is that. For me... give me Liberty and give me freedom. Give me freedom to succeed or fail. And Leave the tyranny for the fool hearted and the naive.

Freddy the freeloader (talk) 08:11, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Freddy the freeloader. <ref life experience>[reply]

How Does this Statement on Individual Capitalism relate to me? I'm responding to Freddy the freeloader's comment on Individual Capitalism: How does your statement on Individual Capitalism relate to me? Overall I do concur that greed can be used wisely under a capitalist system and what many people see as a deadly sin, since greed is often identified as one of the seven deadly sins, I see as a great way to incentivize a system of people to produce, distribute, and/or consume goods and services in a robust economy. A system of natural liberty that automatically guides the economy through the invisible hand of the market place does far more to equitably and efficiently allocate goods and services in an economy versus the planned and command approach of a group of elite oligarchs that believe their wisdom surpasses that of a decentralized market place in how best to distribute goods and services in an economy.

In fact capitalism works best when not any actor in the system holds tremendous power to guide it in whatever fashion he or she deems most appropriate, but only the invisible hand should guide capitalism because only it can aggregate, reward, and fail any and all decisions that yearn to be judged if what each person is doing to contribute to the system is optimal and correct. Only those products demanded by consumers will be produced, and if new products created do not warrant their own demand, they will fail to create the proper incentives for producers to manufacture or furnish such production for the marketplace. This all occurs without some government agency or planning commission determining what consumers need or want because the invisible hand matches true supply and true demand.~~~~