Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlo Tamagnone: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Zedla (talk | contribs)
+d
Zedla (talk | contribs)
→‎Carlo Tamagnone: decade - years
Line 9: Line 9:


*Also deleted from French Wikipedia after a long discussion. See: [http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion:Carlo_Tamagnone/Suppression]. [[User:Hairhorn|Hairhorn]] ([[User talk:Hairhorn|talk]]) 02:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
*Also deleted from French Wikipedia after a long discussion. See: [http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion:Carlo_Tamagnone/Suppression]. [[User:Hairhorn|Hairhorn]] ([[User talk:Hairhorn|talk]]) 02:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', the edit histories for the various foreign language wiki's look suspicious, per the .fr and .it [http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Pagine_da_cancellare/Carlo_Tamagnone] AFD discussions . In light of his publications (all within the last decade or so) I was going to suggest a merge to [[Atheist existentialism]] but with that article's own history and a lack of reliable secondary coverage (google.it searches all come up primary with nothing on scholar or news) I'd have to agree with the nom. &ndash; [[User:Zedla|Zedla]] <small>([[User_talk:Zedla|talk]])</small> 02:36, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', the edit histories for the various foreign language wiki's look suspicious, per the .fr and .it [http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Pagine_da_cancellare/Carlo_Tamagnone] AFD discussions . In light of his publications (all within the last 8 years) I was going to suggest a merge to [[Atheist existentialism]] but with that article's own history and a lack of reliable secondary coverage (google.it searches all come up primary with nothing on scholar or news) I'd have to agree with the nom. &ndash; [[User:Zedla|Zedla]] <small>([[User_talk:Zedla|talk]])</small> 02:36, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:39, 26 May 2009

Carlo Tamagnone

Carlo Tamagnone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Unsourced BLP, no notability established, promotional in tone, etc. This person is an Italian and the Italian Wikipedia deleted the article about him, so why would we have one? DreamGuy (talk) 16:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • He has zero results on JSTOR, although that's a dabatase heavily weighted towards English. Still, zero results means no one writing in English is even citing his work, and a large majority of major philosophy journals are in English. Hairhorn (talk) 19:37, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:04, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete Not in the itWP, which seemed curious; checking, it was speedy deleted from there a few days ago. [1]. I will assume they know what they are doing. Only one of his books has more than one US/Canda library holding :Ateismo filosofico nel mondo antico -- which has 11. Nothing in google Scholar. No evidence of any academic position. DGG (talk) 00:34, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also deleted from French Wikipedia after a long discussion. See: [2]. Hairhorn (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, the edit histories for the various foreign language wiki's look suspicious, per the .fr and .it [3] AFD discussions . In light of his publications (all within the last 8 years) I was going to suggest a merge to Atheist existentialism but with that article's own history and a lack of reliable secondary coverage (google.it searches all come up primary with nothing on scholar or news) I'd have to agree with the nom. – Zedla (talk) 02:36, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]