User talk:Speckssommer: Difference between revisions
Speckssommer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
On the contrary, it is you who are making POV changes to that article. Please stop trying to use wikipedia as a means to settle your personal grievance. [[User:Speckssommer|Speckssommer]] ([[User talk:Speckssommer#top|talk]]) 00:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
On the contrary, it is you who are making POV changes to that article. Please stop trying to use wikipedia as a means to settle your personal grievance. [[User:Speckssommer|Speckssommer]] ([[User talk:Speckssommer#top|talk]]) 00:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
Please stop making POV cuts to the article. I realize you have some sort of personal attachment to this Ning company. Hence the need to remove referenced, historical information pertinent to both Ning and the broader social network phenomenon. Issues of member ownership, adult networks, investments, 3rd party tools, etc. are at the core of the interests of network creators and of media/communiciations companies who leverage these tools for the broader Web 2.0 movement. More and more, these important facets of social networks are part of the history and fabric of the offering and very vitally apart of the value of Wikipedia.[[User:Muggzzi|Muggzzi]] ([[User talk:Muggzzi|talk]]) 06:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:38, 28 May 2009
Please stop making POV changes. All details in the "Controversies" section are well documented.Muggzzi (talk) 13:41, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Please stop vandalizing this page with your POV assertions.Muggzzi (talk) 03:26, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
On the contrary, it is you who are making POV changes to that article. Please stop trying to use wikipedia as a means to settle your personal grievance. Speckssommer (talk) 00:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Please stop making POV cuts to the article. I realize you have some sort of personal attachment to this Ning company. Hence the need to remove referenced, historical information pertinent to both Ning and the broader social network phenomenon. Issues of member ownership, adult networks, investments, 3rd party tools, etc. are at the core of the interests of network creators and of media/communiciations companies who leverage these tools for the broader Web 2.0 movement. More and more, these important facets of social networks are part of the history and fabric of the offering and very vitally apart of the value of Wikipedia.Muggzzi (talk) 06:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC)