Jump to content

Hydrazine sulfate: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 25: Line 25:
== Side effects ==
== Side effects ==
----
----



Side effects, in single-arm controlled Phase II studies, are described as mild and transient, consisting of: minor nausea and vomiting in 5.6 percent of patients, which could not be differentiated from the nausea and vomiting caused by the cancer itself, which either disappeared by itself or by lowering the daily dosage by one-third; “rare” dizziness and excitement; 1.8 percent “polyneuritis” occurring only after “prolonged and continuous” treatment, which could be avoided by frequent shorter courses of therapy and/or “interruption” of therapy between courses; mild euphoria—“mood stimulation, improvement of disposition, disappearance of depression and apathy”—described as a “positive effect,” occurring in upwards of 25 percent of patients. Side effects in these studies were generally characterized as “insignificant” and did not prevent or require the discontinuation or withdrawal of therapy.[3,18]
Side effects, in single-arm controlled Phase II studies, are described as mild and transient, consisting of: minor nausea and vomiting in 5.6 percent of patients, which could not be differentiated from the nausea and vomiting caused by the cancer itself, which either disappeared by itself or by lowering the daily dosage by one-third; “rare” dizziness and excitement; 1.8 percent “polyneuritis” occurring only after “prolonged and continuous” treatment, which could be avoided by frequent shorter courses of therapy and/or “interruption” of therapy between courses; mild euphoria—“mood stimulation, improvement of disposition, disappearance of depression and apathy”—described as a “positive effect,” occurring in upwards of 25 percent of patients. Side effects in these studies were generally characterized as “insignificant” and did not prevent or require the discontinuation or withdrawal of therapy.[3,18]

Revision as of 02:36, 29 May 2009

Hydrazine Sulfate (trade name Hydrazine Sulfate, Sehydrin) is a gluconeogenic blocking agent irreversibly inhibiting the enzyme phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEP CK), and is used in the treatment of cancer cachexia,[1] the weight loss and debilitation seen usually in late-stage cancer, which accounts for upwards of 50 percent of all cancer deaths.[1] It was the first clinical agent developed specifically for the treatment of cancer cachexia.

Hydrazine sulfate is currently available in the United States by a doctor’s prescription filled in a compounding pharmacy. No pharmaceutical company has ever submitted a New Drug Application (NDA) to the United States federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA); consequently an NDA for this drug has never been approved or disapproved by the FDA.

Hydrazine sulfate has been reported to be used in most types of cancer, at all stages, and indicated to be effective by itself, in conjunction with chemotherapy and radiation therapy and with other modalities of cancer treatment.[2]

Background

Hydrazine sulfate was specifically developed as a result of a theoretical paper by Joseph Gold, M.D., indicating cancer glycolysis and normal-body gluconeogenesis to constitute a systemic (whole-body) energy-losing cycle as the biochemical and thermodynamic cause of cancer cachexia and postulating the inhibition of gluconeogenesis at the enzymic site of PEP CK to be an effective treatment for cancer cachexia.[3] It was also postulated that if tumor energy gain (glycolysis) and host-energy loss (gluconeogenesis) were functionally interrelated, inhibition of gluconeogenesis at PEP CK could result in actual tumor regression in addition to reversal or arrest of cancer cachexia.[4]

Indications

Although no NDA has ever been submitted to the FDA for hydrazine sulfate, controlled clinical studies have indicated the utility of this drug in a number of different kinds of cancer, including Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, lung cancer, breast cancer, neurological cancer, colorectal cancer, head and neck cancer, vulvar, cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancer, sarcomas, recurrent desmoid tumors and others.

Investigational

Controlled clinical trials, performed in conformity with the Helsinki Declaration, indicated efficacy and safety in about 50 percent of all patients. Efficacy and safety were expressed in terms of appetite and weight improvements, performance status increase, decrease or disappearance of pain and weakness, tumor stabilization and regression and increased survival time.[5] These multicentric Phase II and randomized, double-blind Phase III clinical trials were carried out at the Petrov Research Institute of Oncology in St. Petersburg (with the participation of the Herzen Institute of Oncology, Moscow, Oncological Institute of Lithuania, Vilnius, Institute of Oncology of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, Kiev, and Rostov Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Rostov an Donau) over a period of 17 years—and at the Harbor-UCLA Medical Center in California over period of 10 years, respectively. Studies were published chiefly in U.S. peer-reviewed, well known journals.

(The Helsinki Declaration—an outgrowth of the Nuremberg trials [Doctors Trial] following World War II which uncovered the heinous medical “experiments” inflicted by the Nazis on helpless human beings—is a multinational ratification of principles governing human biomedical research studies, to which the United States is a signatory, put in place to guarantee that no harmful procedures be used in patients undergoing experimental medical treatment. This Document is central to all clinical studies and informed consent and represents the international “law of the land,” requiring all human biomedical research to conform to its stated principles.)

Hydrazine sulfate was found to be non-effective in three randomized clinical trials sponsored by the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI).[6] These NCI-sponsored studies, however, were said to be in violation[7] of the “generally accepted standards” rule of the Helsinki Declaration, by virtue of their use of incompatible agents (medications) in the presence of a test drug. Principle 1 of the Helsinki Declaration states: “Biomedical research involving human subjects must conform to generally accepted scientific principles…and be based on a thorough knowledge of the scientific literature.” Incompatible medication in the presence of a test drug is virtually unknown in human biomedical testing, since it can result in the grave illness—or death—of a patient and can result in a negative drug study.

By order of Congress, an investigation of the NCI-sponsored studies of hydrazine sulfate was undertaken by the General Accounting Office (GAO), the investigative arm of Congress. After 14 months of investigation, the GAO issued a 28-page Final Draft Report highly critical of the NCI-sponsored studies[8] (“N.I.H. Actions Spur Continued Controversy Over Hydrazine Sulfate Therapy”), which included the following statements: “NCI did not conduct adequate oversight of these trials. It did not take sufficient measures to appropriately address concerns over alleged incompatible agents. The issue of possible incompatibility of hydrazine sulfate with certain other agents remains unsettled.” This report was circulated as a routine courtesy to the Food and Drug Administration, the Public Health Service, the NCI and certain Congressional committees, for any comments prior to publication. According to an investigative report,[16] within days of receipt of this draft report, the NCI demanded changes, the lead investigator was dismissed and a new and official GAO report was shortly thereafter prepared and issued to Congress and to the public, totally exonerating the NCI-sponsored studies of any deficiencies or flaws.[9]


Side effects



Side effects, in single-arm controlled Phase II studies, are described as mild and transient, consisting of: minor nausea and vomiting in 5.6 percent of patients, which could not be differentiated from the nausea and vomiting caused by the cancer itself, which either disappeared by itself or by lowering the daily dosage by one-third; “rare” dizziness and excitement; 1.8 percent “polyneuritis” occurring only after “prolonged and continuous” treatment, which could be avoided by frequent shorter courses of therapy and/or “interruption” of therapy between courses; mild euphoria—“mood stimulation, improvement of disposition, disappearance of depression and apathy”—described as a “positive effect,” occurring in upwards of 25 percent of patients. Side effects in these studies were generally characterized as “insignificant” and did not prevent or require the discontinuation or withdrawal of therapy.[3,18]

In the randomized, controlled, double-blind Phase III studies, no carcinogenicity or documentation of organ failure were recorded. “There were no significant differences between the protocol arms [hydrazine sulfate and placebo] with regard to myelodepression, gastrointestinal toxicity, renal toxicity, cardiopulmonary toxicity or neurotoxicity,”[12]

Drug Incompatibilities



Hydrazine sulfate is an MAO (monoamine oxidase) inhibitor and is incompatible with alcohol, tranquilizers, sleeping pills and other psycho-active drugs, with meperidine (Demerol), and with foods containing significant amounts of the amino acid tyramine, such as most cheeses, raisins, avocados, processed and cured fish and meats, fermented products, and others.


Costs



Hydrazine sulfate is a mass-produced chemical, used in myriad industrial applications and consequently very inexpensive. Drug grade hydrazine sulfate is reportedly dispensed by compounding pharmacies in 30 mg and 60 mg capsules or tablets at a cost ranging from $20.00 to $60.00 per 100 capsules or tablets, representing a one-to-two month supply.


References


  1. ^ [2]
  2. ^ [3-5]
  3. ^ [6]
  4. ^ [7]
  5. ^ [3,4,9]
  6. ^ [10-13]
  7. ^ [14]
  8. ^ [15]
  9. ^ [17]

1..Chlebowski RT, Bulcavage L, Grosvenor M, et al. (February 1987). “Hydrazine Sulfate in Cancer Patients With Weight Loss. A Placebo-Controlled Clinical Experience.” Cancer 59:406-410.

2. Brauer M, Inculet RI, Bratnager G, et al. (December 1994).  “Insulin Protects against Hepatic Bioenergetic Deterioration by Cancer Cachexia. An in-Vivo 31P Magnetic Resonance Study.” Cancer Research 54:6383-6386.
 3. Filov VA, Gershanovich ML, Danova LA, Ivin BA. “Experience of the Treatment with Sehydrin (Hydrazine Sulfate, HS) in the Advanced Cancer Patients.” Investigational New Drugs 13:89-97, 1995.
  4, Chlebowski RT, Bulcavage L, Grosvenor M, et al. (January 1990).  “Hydrazine Sulfate Influence on Nutritional Status and Survival in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.” Journal of Clinical Oncology 8:9-15.
  5. Gold J (March 1999). “Long term complete response in patient with advanced, localized NSCLC with hydrazine sulfate, radiation and Carboplatin, refractory to combination chemotherapy.” Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research 40:642.
  6. Gold J. “Proposed Treatment of Cancer by Inhibition of Gluconeogenesis.”  Oncology 22:185-207, 1968.
  7. Gold J (March 1974). “Cancer Cachexia and Gluconeogenesis.”  Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 230:103-110.
  8. Chlebowski RT, Heber D, Richardson B, Block JB (February 1984).  “Influence of Hydrazine Sulfate on Abnormal Carbohydrate Metabolism in Cancer Patients with Weight Loss.” Cancer Research 44:857-861.
  9, Tayek JA, Heber D, Chlebowski RT (August 1987). “Effect of Hydrazine Sulphate on Whole-Body Protein Breakdown Measured by 14C-Lysine Metabolism in Lung Cancer Patients.” The Lancet 2:241-244.
10. Kosty MP, Fleishman SB, Herndon II JE, et al. (June 1994). “Cisplatin, Vinblastine and Hydrazine Sulfate in Advanced, Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Phase III Study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.” Journal of Clinical Oncology 12:1113-1120. 
11. Loprinzi, CL Kuross SA, O’Fallon JR, et al. (June 1994). “Randomized Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of Hydrazine Sulfate in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer.” Journal of Clinical Oncology 12:1121-1125.
12. Loprinizi CL, Goldberg RM, Su JQ, et al. (June 1994). “Placebo-Controlled Trial of Hydrazine Sulfate in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.” Journal of Clinical Oncology 12:1126-1129.
13. Kosty MP, Herndon II JE, Green MR, McIntyre OR (June 1995). “Placebo-Controlled Randomized Study of Hydrazine Sulfate in Lung Cancer” (letter). Journal of Clinical Oncology 13:1529-1530.
14. Gold J. MedTruth (blog). “If you have cancer, even advanced, studies show this drug may help save your life…” March 2, 2009.
15 “N.I.H. Actions Spur Continued Controversy Over Hydrazine Sulfate Therapy” (June 1995). GAO/HEHS-95-141.  
 16. Kamen J. “Intent To Kill. The government conspiracy to destroy hydrazine sulfate.” Penthouse, September 1998. 
 17. “Contrary to Allegation, NIH Studies of Hydrazine Sulfate Were Not Flawed” (September 1995). GAO/HEHS-95-141.
 18. Gershanovich ML, Danova LA, Ivin BA, Filov VA. “Results of Clinical Study of Antitumor Action of Hydrazine Sulfate.” Nutrition and Cancer 3:7-12, 1981.

External links

  scri.ngen.com 
   hydrazinesulfate.org
   MedTruth (blog)