User talk:Redvers

AIV

Thank you for your ongoing help in interpreting for me wtf is going on! I appreciate it!! Pdfpdf (talk) 14:27, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Why? Pdfpdf (talk) 14:46, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

This very busy page is patrolled by a series of bots, which keep the page ticking over to let us react quickly. Additions like that can break the operation of the bots, slowing everything down. Also, and, really, no offence is intended, 99% of editors are able to work out how the page works almost instantly, or at least follow the links in the header to see how it works, or watch it for 5 minutes to see how everyone else does it, or look in the history and see how everbody else did it. Except you :o) ➲ redvers ^{throwing my arms around Paris} 10:59, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

• From the editor: Browsing the archives
• Book review: Review of The Future of the Internet
• Scientology: End of Scientology arbitration brings blocks, media coverage
• News and notes: Picture of the Year, Wikipedia's first logo, Board elections, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Tamil Wikipedia, Internet Watch Foundation, and more
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Why!

Why, I mean, maybe a new user doesn´t think on editing, but when he sees a quick welcome, he starts editing! And, there isn't a bad side on this!RatónBat (talk · contribs) 13:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

It took more space cuase i didn't write much! Duh! and it's my little secret...RatónBat (talk · contribs) 12:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Bart Has Two Mummies

I noticed you deleted "Bart Has Two Mummies" witch probably redirected to "Bart Has Two Mommies" for the reason "CSD R3: Implausible typo", but I disagree that it is implausible. "Mummies" is the British spelling of the American "Mommies".--Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

This redirect was, for some reason, very very controversial in its time. However, I simply can't remember at this remove what was controversial about it. Nevertheless, I think community input would be needed. May I suggest you take it to WP:DELREV just to get a spread of opinion? I happen to still believe that it's a ludicrous redirect (and I'm British), but the consensus may have changed or have never existed. ➲ redvers ^{throwing my arms around Paris} 07:38, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Should this section be moved to Deletion review?--Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 15:42, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

When you respond, please put "{{Talkback|Redvers}}" on my talk page.--Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 22:45, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

It'd be less work for both of us if you temporarily watchlist this page until I replied. ➲ redvers ^{throwing my arms around Paris} 07:38, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:47, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

FYI

[1] rootology (C)(T) 17:40, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

TechAndEthicsIn

Thanks for the fast response with regard to the material added by User:TechAndEthicsIn! Usually it takes some time for admins to analyze a CSD request and the associated behavior, but that was very quick. Thanks again! --Kuzaar^-T-C- 14:29, 9 June 2009 (UTC)