User talk:Pinkadelica: Difference between revisions
→Apologies: new section |
→Louise Robey: new section |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Hi, I originally reverted you at the [[Louise Robey]] article but then I reverted myself. I'm sorry it's late in the day for me here and I made an honest mistake and then caught it. I didn't read it properly, again I'm sorry, --[[User:Crohnie|<span style="color:purpled ">'''Crohnie'''</span><span style="color:deeppink">'''Gal'''</span>]][[User talk:Crohnie|<span style="color:deepskyblue"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]] 19:02, 8 June 2009 (UTC) |
Hi, I originally reverted you at the [[Louise Robey]] article but then I reverted myself. I'm sorry it's late in the day for me here and I made an honest mistake and then caught it. I didn't read it properly, again I'm sorry, --[[User:Crohnie|<span style="color:purpled ">'''Crohnie'''</span><span style="color:deeppink">'''Gal'''</span>]][[User talk:Crohnie|<span style="color:deepskyblue"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]] 19:02, 8 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Louise Robey == |
|||
The reason her wesite has the same or similar text is because I asked them to do it... i can have them make some chaanges if you like and then maybe the problem will go away... please tell me what site (as she has many) that you are referring to and we can get this fixed quickly. |
|||
Please work with us on this and not against us... just ell me what to do and it will be done so we can both be happy... sorry for my lack of knowledge but I will learn with your help. |
|||
Stan Shaffer for Louise Robey[[User:Estanoman|Estanoman]] ([[User talk:Estanoman|talk]]) 14:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:45, 9 June 2009
(Click here to leave me a message)
llLouise Robey page
why do you continue to revert back to an outdated page.. I am Stan Shaffer...Louise Robey's husband and she is merely trying to update her bio with her own words and with nothing that cant be verified... please stop changing it back...you are putting up currently incomplete or untrue information Estanoman (talk) 12:22, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Re:
That's because you can't help but watchlist them!!! Sort of like my issues with Excuses. We just cannot say no!! Wildhartlivie (talk) 17:30, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Wasn't that Wood thing totally outrageous?? I'll let you know when I get the AN/I post ready, I'm sure there will be several comments added by various editors, you can pull out your comments from Cher and elsewhere. I think poor ole R.J. could stand a bit of clean up!! Wildhartlivie (talk) 18:01, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Apologies
Hi, I originally reverted you at the Louise Robey article but then I reverted myself. I'm sorry it's late in the day for me here and I made an honest mistake and then caught it. I didn't read it properly, again I'm sorry, --CrohnieGalTalk 19:02, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Louise Robey
The reason her wesite has the same or similar text is because I asked them to do it... i can have them make some chaanges if you like and then maybe the problem will go away... please tell me what site (as she has many) that you are referring to and we can get this fixed quickly. Please work with us on this and not against us... just ell me what to do and it will be done so we can both be happy... sorry for my lack of knowledge but I will learn with your help. Stan Shaffer for Louise RobeyEstanoman (talk) 14:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)