Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 June 21: Difference between revisions
Added "Alive in Joburg"-request |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:Newdelrev|pg=PAGENAME|ns=NAMESPACE of page (optional)|reason=UNDELETE_REASON}} ~~~~ --> |
Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:Newdelrev|pg=PAGENAME|ns=NAMESPACE of page (optional)|reason=UNDELETE_REASON}} ~~~~ --> |
||
====[[:Alive in Joburg]]==== |
|||
:{{DRV links|Alive in Joburg|xfd_page=|article=}} |
|||
Deleted for not being noteworthy, but upcoming feature film [[District 9]] makes it so, IMHO. [[Special:Contributions/213.21.98.80|213.21.98.80]] ([[User talk:213.21.98.80|talk]]) 11:38, 21 June 2009 (UTC) |
|||
====[[:Theodore Kowal]]==== |
====[[:Theodore Kowal]]==== |
Revision as of 11:38, 21 June 2009
Deleted for not being noteworthy, but upcoming feature film District 9 makes it so, IMHO. 213.21.98.80 (talk) 11:38, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
I lodged an article deletion review because the article's deletion seemed questionable. The article was restored by Aervanath to one of my user pages. I moved it from my user page back to Theodore Kowal and it was deleted again within about an hour. It seems strange to have been deleted again, and so soon, after it was restored. Next time, could the article be restored directly to Theodore Kowal with a note that it has been recently restored and to hold off deletion. NB: I did not create the article but thought the content seemed interesting enough to retain. Frei Hans (talk) 11:30, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
CodeineFree (closed)
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Sorry if this is in the wrong place, but I disagree with the article CodeineFree not being deleted. It is blatant advertising only, with unencylopedic content, not a single citation, and written nearly solely by the person who runs the site. I say we delete... Can the powers that be, please review this? thanks :) Dvmedis (talk) 01:49, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |