Jump to content

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 June 21: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Frei Hans (talk | contribs)
Added "Alive in Joburg"-request
Line 4: Line 4:


Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:Newdelrev|pg=PAGENAME|ns=NAMESPACE of page (optional)|reason=UNDELETE_REASON}} ~~~~ -->
Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE copying the format: {{subst:Newdelrev|pg=PAGENAME|ns=NAMESPACE of page (optional)|reason=UNDELETE_REASON}} ~~~~ -->


====[[:Alive in Joburg]]====
:{{DRV links|Alive in Joburg|xfd_page=|article=}}

Deleted for not being noteworthy, but upcoming feature film [[District 9]] makes it so, IMHO. [[Special:Contributions/213.21.98.80|213.21.98.80]] ([[User talk:213.21.98.80|talk]]) 11:38, 21 June 2009 (UTC)


====[[:Theodore Kowal]]====
====[[:Theodore Kowal]]====

Revision as of 11:38, 21 June 2009

Alive in Joburg (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)

Deleted for not being noteworthy, but upcoming feature film District 9 makes it so, IMHO. 213.21.98.80 (talk) 11:38, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Theodore Kowal (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)

I lodged an article deletion review because the article's deletion seemed questionable. The article was restored by Aervanath to one of my user pages. I moved it from my user page back to Theodore Kowal and it was deleted again within about an hour. It seems strange to have been deleted again, and so soon, after it was restored. Next time, could the article be restored directly to Theodore Kowal with a note that it has been recently restored and to hold off deletion. NB: I did not create the article but thought the content seemed interesting enough to retain. Frei Hans (talk) 11:30, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CodeineFree (closed)