Talk:Snapfish: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:49, 23 June 2009

details

can a snapfish member elaborate on what the site offers? uploads per month, storage capacity, site services, printing.....--Shaggorama (talk) 12:52, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A notable feature of snapfish is that you are required you to open an account in order to view photos, unlike most other photo storage sites. Therefore, an invitation from a user to view their photos on snapfish, is in effect an invitation to join the site. I think this is worth mentioning. 93.96.142.159 (talk) 09:49, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

snapfish relation to clarkcolor.com and yorkphoto.com

All three sites have the exact same design and layout. All use snapfish DNS servers. The site images are all hosted from a snapfish.com subdomain. The other two sites have districtphoto.com as the administrative contact. I suspect that district photo is the owner of Clark Color Labs and York Photos, and the fufillment partner of HP. District photo was the owner of the Snapfish service prior to HP, according to http://www.districtphoto.com/about_history.html. 76.6.160.198 (talk) 15:39, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 can a snapfish member elaborate on what the site offers? uploads per month, storage capacity, site services, printing.....--[[User:Shaggorama|Shaggorama]] ([[User talk:Shaggorama|talk]]) 12:52, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
+A notable feature of snapfish is that you are required you to open an account in order to view photos, unlike most other photo storage sites. Therefore, an invitation from a user to view their photos on snapfish, is in effect an invitation to join the site. I think this is worth mentioning. [[Special:Contributions/93.96.142.159|93.96.142.159]] ([[User talk:93.96.142.159|talk]]) 09:49, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 == snapfish relation to clarkcolor.com and yorkphoto.com ==